The relationship between networks, institutional development, and performance in foreign investments

This paper empirically examines the relationship between the external business network of a country business unit (CBU) of a multinational firm, its performance, and the unique institutional characteristics of the foreign market in which it operates. We develop hypotheses about the CBU network structure associated with operating margin given different levels of institutional development, and the categories of network contacts associated with CBU operating margin. We test the hypotheses using social network analysis in 54 CBUs in two different business segments within one multinational company. Results show that the CBU network structure associated with higher operating margin depended partially on the level of the country's institutional development, and that network composition related strongly to CBU operating margin. We identify implications for research. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Shige Makino,et al.  Which country matters? Institutional development and foreign affiliate performance , 2008 .

[3]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[4]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The Effects of Customer Relationships and Social Capital on Firm Performance: A Chinese Business Illustration , 2004 .

[5]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance , 2003 .

[6]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  The Impact of the Top Management Team's International Business Experience on the Firm's Internationalization: Social Networks at Work , 2002 .

[7]  Yadong Luo.  Toward a Cooperative View of MNC-Host Government Relations: Building Blocks and Performance Implications , 2001 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations , 2001 .

[9]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[10]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[11]  R. Inglehart,et al.  Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[13]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[15]  Homin Chen,et al.  Network Linkages and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment , 1998 .

[16]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[17]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[18]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS: A GLOBAL STUDY OF SURVIVAL IN FINANCIAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[19]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[21]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[22]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[23]  Christina L. Ahmadjian,et al.  Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan , 1996 .

[24]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  Long-Term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay off for Supplier Firms? , 1995 .

[26]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[27]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[28]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[29]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data , 1986 .

[30]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Changing Patterns of International Competition , 1986 .

[31]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[32]  S. Hymer,et al.  The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , 1976 .

[33]  R. Inderst,et al.  Transaction costs, norms and social networks , 2003 .

[34]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  The motivational foundation of social networks , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[35]  Anuska Ferligoj,et al.  Estimating the reliability and validity of personal support measures: full information ML estimation with planned incomplete data , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[36]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks : A tacit knowledge perspective , 1999 .

[37]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[40]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .