Perspective of Structural Health Monitoring for Military Aviation in Poland

About 40 years have passed from introducing non-destructive testing inspections (NDI) as an inherent component of damage tolerant approach in order to ensure structural integrity of aircrafts. Over the years, non-destructive testing (NDT) methods became very accurate and reliable in damage detection and assessment, allowing to achieve very high level of safety in the aerospace. However, still there are some issues of this aircraft design paradigm which need to be addressed in the future. First, NDI are scheduled based on assumed or statistically represented loads spectrum, which doesn’t necessarily fit to the way which a given aircraft is operated. This jeopardize the safety, but also is connected with not scheduled inspections, whose costs are much higher than regular ones. In fact, the fraction of unexpected NDI prevail over scheduled inspections. Furthermore, application of new lightweight materials, e.g. composites, introduces new damage evolution pathways, making it difficult to use low cost NDT techniques like visual testing, which account for about 60% of overall NDI. Therefore, there is a strong need from the industry sector to introduce Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and Operational Load Monitoring (OLM) systems, based on sensors permanently integrated with the aircraft structure. Application of such systems would definitely increase safety, especially when considering hardly accessible ‘hot-spots’, but it could also save up to 50% of necessary inspections time depending on the aircraft type. Furthermore, possessing the knowledge about the current state of an aircraft as well as the way it is used, would allow to predict its further performance and determine the optimal time for its overhauls. Clearly, damage detection and damage assessment capabilities of SHM systems, e.g. expressed in terms of PoD curves, are the most important ones. However, from the cost analysis perspective, also a very important property of SHM systems is their false calls ratio. Damage indication by SHM system will be verified with classical NDT methods, at least at their early stage of development, which would increase the number of unplanned NDI and could rise aircraft maintenance costs, if there would be too much false positive findings. Both, the improvement of damage detection capabilities as well as the reduction of false calls ratio of SHM systems, are as much important for their applicability.