Expertise makes the world slow down: Judgements of duration are influenced by domain knowledge

Experts often appear to perceive time differently from novices. The current study thus examined perceptions of time as a function of domain expertise. Specifically, individuals with high or low levels of knowledge of American football made judgements of duration for briefly presented words that were unrelated to football (e.g., rooster), football specific (e.g., touchdown), or ambiguous (e.g., huddle). Results showed that high-knowledge individuals judged football-specific words as having been presented for a longer duration than unrelated or ambiguous words. In contrast, low-knowledge participants exhibited no systematic differences in judgements of duration based on the type of word presented. These findings are discussed within a fluency attribution framework, which suggests that experts’ fluent perception of domain-relevant stimuli leads to the subjective impression that time slows down in one's domain of expertise.

[1]  L. Cronbach The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[2]  J. Warm,et al.  Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  L. Avant,et al.  Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in prerecognition visual processing. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive processing and time perception , 1975 .

[5]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Light intensity and judged duration , 1978 .

[6]  J. Starkes,et al.  Perception in Sport: Volleyball , 1980 .

[7]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[8]  D. Witherspoon,et al.  The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[9]  P. Saariluoma,et al.  Chess players' intake of task-relevant cues , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[13]  R. Block,et al.  Temporal Cognition , 1997 .

[14]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. , 1999 .

[15]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment , 2002 .

[16]  R. Reber,et al.  Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  Individual differences in time estimation related to cognitive ability, speed of information processing and working memory , 2005 .

[18]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[19]  A. Castel,et al.  The Dark Side of Expertise , 2007, Psychological science.