National Trends in Use and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheters Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999-2013

Importance Recent studies have observed an increase in the rate of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use in heart failure admissions. Little is known about the national trends in other previously common indications for PAC placement, PAC use overall, or outcomes associated with PAC placement. Objective To determine national trends in PAC use overall as well as across sociodemographic groups and key clinical conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to conduct a serial cross-sectional cohort study between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, identifying hospitalizations during which a PAC was placed. Data analysis was conducted from September 25, 2015, to April 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Rate of use of a PAC per 1000 admissions, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Results Among the 68 374 904 unique Medicare beneficiaries in the study, there were 469 582 hospitalizations among 457 193 patients (204 232 women and 252 961 men; mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.9] years) during which a PAC was placed. There was a 67.8% relative decrease in PAC use (6.28 per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 2.02 per 1000 admissions in 2013; P < .001), with 2 distinct trends: significant year-on-year decreases from 1999 to 2011, followed by stable use through 2013. There was variation in rates of PAC use across race/ethnicity, age, and sex, but use decreased across all subgroups. Although there were sustained decreases in PAC use for acute myocardial infarction (20.0 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 5.2 in 2013 [74.0% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) and respiratory failure (29.9 PACs placed per 1000 admission in 1999 to 2.3 in 2013 [92.3% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) during the study period, there was an initial decrease in PAC use in heart failure, with a nadir in 2009 followed by a subsequent increase (9.1 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 4.0 in 2009 to 5.8 in 2013). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay decreased during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance In the wake of mounting evidence suggesting a lack of benefit to the routine use of PACs, there has been a de-adoption of PAC use overall and across sociodemographic groups but heterogeneity in patterns of use across clinical conditions. The clinical outcomes of patients with PACs have significantly improved. These findings raise important questions about the optimal use of PACs and the drivers of the observed trends.

[1]  A. Pandey,et al.  Variation in Hospital Use and Outcomes Associated With Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure in the United States , 2016, Circulation. Heart failure.

[2]  G. Bernard,et al.  Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Angus Ongoing Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheters Despite Negative Trial Findings. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[4]  A. Pandey,et al.  Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in US Patients With Heart Failure, 2001-2012. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[5]  D. Young,et al.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  Monica R. Shah,et al.  Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness The ESCAPE Trial , 2005 .

[7]  William A. Knaus,et al.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[8]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. , 2014, JAMA.

[9]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Trends in comorbidity, disability, and polypharmacy in heart failure. , 2011, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  Lung Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. , 2009 .

[11]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  William T. Abraham,et al.  Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness , 2005 .

[13]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Revel,et al.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury, H.P. Wiedemann, A.P. Wheeler, G.R. Bernard, B.T. Thompson, D. Hayden, B. deBoisblanc, A.F Jr. Connors, R.D. Hite, A.L. Harabin, in: N Engl J Med, 354. (2006), 2564 , 2007 .

[15]  G. Rubenfeld,et al.  Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. , 2007, JAMA.

[16]  W. Baine,et al.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2006, Italian Journal of Public Health.