The Influence of Function, Topography, and Setting on Noncontingent Reinforcement Effect Sizes for Reduction in Problem Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Single-Case Experimental Design Data

[1]  J. Tiger,et al.  Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training. , 2015, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  Laura M. Grubb,et al.  Meta-analysis of noncontingent reinforcement effects on problem behavior. , 2015, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  W. Fisher,et al.  The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape. , 2014, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  T. Vollmer,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Nail Biting in Typically Developing Children , 2014, Behavior modification.

[5]  W. Shadish Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: an introduction. , 2014, Journal of school psychology.

[6]  Terry S. Falcomata,et al.  An Evaluation of Noncontingent Reinforcement for the Treatment of Challenging Behavior with Multiple Functions , 2014 .

[7]  Kristina K. Vargo,et al.  Precursor manic behavior in the assessment and treatment of episodic problem behavior for a woman with a dual diagnosis. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Sarah E. Bloom,et al.  Teacher-conducted trial-based functional analyses as the basis for intervention. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Sarah E. Bloom,et al.  Experimental analysis of precursors to severe problem behavior. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  B. Iwata,et al.  Assessment and treatment of chronic hand mouthing. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  J. Luiselli,et al.  Functional analysis and intervention for chronic rumination. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  B. Iwata,et al.  Does supplementary reinforcement of stereotypy facilitate extinction? , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  Amy M. Briesch,et al.  An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research , 2013 .

[14]  J. Ganz,et al.  The Effect of Noncontingent Positive Versus Negative Reinforcement on Multiply Controlled Behavior During Discrete Trial Training , 2013 .

[15]  B. Iwata,et al.  Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment. , 2012, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  J. Rapp,et al.  The utility of assessing musical preference before implementation of noncontingent music to reduce vocal stereotypy. , 2012, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  David C. Parker,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Incremental Rehearsal Using Phi Coefficients to Compare Single-Case and Group Designs , 2012 .

[18]  Stephen P. Kilgus,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Basic Mathematics Computation in Single-case Research , 2012 .

[19]  Matthew K. Burns,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2012 .

[20]  H. Roane,et al.  Effects of access to a stimulating object on infant behavior during tummy time. , 2012, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[21]  C. Tung,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research on Self-Regulatory Interventions for Academic Performance , 2012 .

[22]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Bottom-Up Analysis of Single-Case Research Designs , 2012 .

[23]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Synthesizing Single-Case Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practices: Some Brief Reflections , 2012 .

[24]  Robert H. Hariharan George Keith Horner,et al.  Considerations for the Systematic Analysis and Use of Single-Case Research , 2012 .

[25]  Devender R. Banda,et al.  Effectiveness of Noncontingent Attention to Decrease Attention-Maintained Disruptive Behaviors in the General Education Classroom , 2012 .

[26]  P. Reed,et al.  Effects of Fixed-Time Reinforcement Delivered by Teachers for Reducing Problem Behavior in Special Education Classrooms , 2012 .

[27]  Vito M. R. Muggeo,et al.  Quantifying Treatment Effects When Flexibly Modeling Individual Change in a Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model , 2011, Journal of Data Science.

[28]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Designs Technical Documentation. , 2010 .

[29]  Jennifer Duffy,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[30]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination , 2005, Prevention Science.

[31]  M. Wolery,et al.  The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education , 2005 .

[32]  Timomy R. VoumLEER,et al.  NONCONTINGENT ESCAPE AS TREATMENT FOR SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT , 2005 .

[33]  Brian A Iwata,et al.  Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. , 2003, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[34]  J. Lochman Commentary: School Contextual Influences on the Dissemination of Interventions , 2003 .

[35]  S. Kahng,et al.  Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964 to 2000. , 2002, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[36]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[37]  J. E. Carr,et al.  A review of "noncontingent" reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities. , 2000, Research in developmental disabilities.

[38]  B. Iwata,et al.  Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition. , 2000, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Meta‐analysis using multilevel models with an application to the study of class size effects , 2000 .

[40]  B. Iwata,et al.  A comparison of noncontingent reinforcement and sensory extinction as treatments for self-injurious behavior. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[41]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Some Methods Are More Effective Than Others , 1998 .

[42]  T. Vollmer,et al.  Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. , 1997, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[43]  D. Krych,et al.  The use of noncontingent reinforcement and contingent restraint to reduce physical aggression and self-injurious behaviour in a traumatically brain injured adult. , 1997, Brain injury.

[44]  J. Sprague,et al.  The effect of noncontingent sensory reinforcement, contingent sensory reinforcement, and response interruption on stereotypical and self-injurious behavior. , 1997, Research in developmental disabilities.

[45]  T. Vollmer,et al.  Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. , 1996, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[46]  W. Fisher,et al.  The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint. , 1996, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[47]  R. G. Smith,et al.  The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[48]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer , 1992 .

[49]  J. Halle,et al.  Assessing stimulus control in natural settings: an analysis of stimuli that acquire control during training. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[50]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[51]  K. Kavale Potential Advantages of the Meta-Analysis Technique for Research in Special Education , 1984 .

[52]  R. Orwin A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. , 1983 .