Fusion of Face Recognition Classifiers under Adverse Conditions

A face acquired by recognition systems is invariably subject to environmental and sensing conditions, which may change over time. This may have a significant negative impact on the accuracy of recognition algorithms. In the past, these problems have been tackled by building in invariance to the various changes, by adaptation, and by multiple expert systems. More recently, the possibility of enhancing the pattern classification system robustness by using auxiliary information has been explored. In particular, by measuring the extent of degradation, the resulting sensory data quality information can be used to combat the effect of the degradation phenomena. This can be achieved by using the auxiliary quality information as features in the fusion stage of a multiple classifier system, which uses the discriminant function values from the first stage as inputs. Data quality can be measured directly from the sensory data. Different architectures are suggested in this chapter for decision making using quality information. Examples of these architectures are presented and their relative merits discussed. The problems and benefits associated with the use of auxiliary information in sensory data analysis are illustrated on the problem of personal identity verification used in biometrics. Norman Poh University of Surrey, UK Chi Ho Chan University of Surrey, UK Josef Kittler University of Surrey, UK DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5966-7.ch010

[1]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Validating a Biometric Authentication System: Sample Size Requirements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Hong Yan,et al.  Comparison of face verification results on the XM2VTFS database , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[3]  Josef Kittler,et al.  On Combination of Face Authentication Experts by a Mixture of Quality Dependent Fusion Classifiers , 2007, MCS.

[4]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  The MobiFall Dataset: Fall Detection and Classification with a Smartphone , 2014, Int. J. Monit. Surveillance Technol. Res..

[5]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Quality dependent fusion of intramodal and multimodal biometric experts , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Local binary patterns as an image preprocessing for face authentication , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[7]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Quality-Based Score Normalization With Device Qualitative Information for Multimodal Biometric Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[8]  Ralph Gross,et al.  An Image Preprocessing Algorithm for Illumination Invariant Face Recognition , 2003, AVBPA.

[9]  Wen Gao,et al.  Performance Characterisation of Face Recognition Algorithms and Their Sensitivity to Severe Illumination Changes , 2006, ICB.

[10]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Matching Scores for LDA-based Face Verification , 2000, BMVC.

[11]  Miltiadis Alamaniotis,et al.  Creep Rupture Forecasting: A Machine Learning Approach to Useful Life Estimation , 2014, Int. J. Monit. Surveillance Technol. Res..

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Samy Bengio,et al.  User authentication via adapted statistical models of face images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.