Automated discovery of interpretable hyperelastic material models for human brain tissue with EUCLID

We propose an automated computational algorithm for simultaneous model selection and parameter identification for the hyperelastic mechanical characterization of human brain tissue. Following the motive of the recently proposed computational framework EUCLID (Efficient Unsupervised Constitutive Law Identitication and Discovery) and in contrast to conventional parameter calibration methods, we construct an extensive set of candidate hyperelastic models, i.e., a model library including popular models known from the literature, and develop a computational strategy for automatically selecting a model from the library that conforms to the available experimental data while being represented as an interpretable symbolic mathematical expression. This computational strategy comprises sparse regression, i.e., a regression problem that is regularized by a sparsity promoting penalty term that filters out irrelevant models from the model library, and a clustering method for grouping together highly correlated and thus redundant features in the model library. The model selection procedure is driven by labelled data pairs stemming from mechanical tests under different deformation modes, i.e., uniaxial compression/tension and simple torsion, and can thus be interpreted as a supervised counterpart to the originally proposed EUCLID that is informed by full-field displacement data and global reaction forces. The proposed method is verified on synthetical data with artificial noise and validated on experimental data acquired through mechanical tests of human brain specimens, proving that the method is capable of discovering hyperelastic models that exhibit both high fitting accuracy to the data as well as concise and thus interpretable mathematical representations.

[1]  C. Farhat,et al.  A Mechanics-Informed Neural Network Framework for Data-Driven Nonlinear Viscoelasticity , 2023, AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum.

[2]  L. De Lorenzis,et al.  Automated identification of linear viscoelastic constitutive laws with EUCLID , 2022, Mechanics of Materials.

[3]  S. Budday,et al.  Inverse identification of region-specific hyperelastic material parameters for human brain tissue , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  L. Lorenzis,et al.  Automated discovery of generalized standard material models with EUCLID , 2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[5]  K. Linka,et al.  A new family of Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks towards automated model discovery , 2022, ArXiv.

[6]  J. Guilleminot,et al.  Polyconvex neural networks for hyperelastic constitutive models: A rectification approach , 2022, Mechanics Research Communications.

[7]  M. Itskov,et al.  Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regression , 2022, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[8]  Dominik Klein,et al.  Finite electro-elasticity with physics-augmented neural networks , 2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[9]  L. Lorenzis,et al.  NN-EUCLID: deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress data , 2022, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[10]  S. Budday,et al.  Tissue‐Scale Biomechanical Testing of Brain Tissue for the Calibration of Nonlinear Material Models , 2022, Current protocols.

[11]  L. Lorenzis,et al.  Bayesian-EUCLID: discovering hyperelastic material laws with uncertainties , 2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[12]  L. De Lorenzis,et al.  Discovering plasticity models without stress data , 2022, npj Computational Materials.

[13]  C. Farhat,et al.  A mechanics‐informed artificial neural network approach in data‐driven constitutive modeling , 2022, AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum.

[14]  M. Kästner,et al.  Automated constitutive modeling of isotropic hyperelasticity based on artificial neural networks , 2021, Computational Mechanics.

[15]  F. Sahli Costabal,et al.  Data-driven Tissue Mechanics with Polyconvex Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. , 2021, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[16]  C. Cyron,et al.  Unraveling the Local Relation Between Tissue Composition and Human Brain Mechanics Through Machine Learning , 2021, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[17]  Jonathan B Estrada,et al.  Inference of deformation mechanisms and constitutive response of soft material surrogates of biological tissue by full-field characterization and data-driven variational system identification , 2021 .

[18]  G.F. Bomarito,et al.  Development of interpretable, data-driven plasticity models with symbolic regression , 2021 .

[19]  Yaru Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of 85 hyperelastic constitutive models for both unfilled rubber and highly filled rubber nanocomposite material , 2021, Nano Materials Science.

[20]  Patrizio Neff,et al.  Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks , 2021, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[21]  G. Kronberger,et al.  Application of symbolic regression for constitutive modeling of plastic deformation , 2021 .

[22]  M. Cho,et al.  Multiscale constitutive model using data–driven yield function , 2021, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[23]  H. Dal,et al.  On the Performance of Isotropic Hyperelastic Constitutive Models for Rubber-Like Materials: A State of the Art Review , 2021 .

[24]  L. Lorenzis,et al.  Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws , 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[25]  Laura Swiler,et al.  Tensor Basis Gaussian Process Models of Hyperelastic Materials , 2019, Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing.

[26]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  Fifty Shades of Brain: A Review on the Mechanical Testing and Modeling of Brain Tissue , 2019, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[27]  C. Birkl,et al.  Mechanical characterization of human brain tissue. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Trenton Kirchdoerfer,et al.  Data-driven computational mechanics , 2015, 1510.04232.

[29]  S. Brunton,et al.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  Hyperelastic models for rubber-like materials: consistent tangent operators and suitability for Treloar’s data , 2012 .

[31]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[32]  Erwan Verron,et al.  Comparison of Hyperelastic Models for Rubber-Like Materials , 2006 .

[33]  Stefan Hartmann,et al.  Parameter estimation of hyperelasticity relations of generalized polynomial-type with constraint conditions , 2001 .

[34]  M. Boyce,et al.  Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: A review , 2000 .

[35]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[36]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[37]  J. Friedman,et al.  [A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools]: Response , 1993 .

[38]  J. Friedman,et al.  A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools , 1993 .

[39]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Knowledge-Based Modeling of Material Behavior with Neural Networks , 1992 .

[40]  R. Ogden Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[41]  A. Gent,et al.  Forms for the stored (strain) energy function for vulcanized rubber , 1958 .

[42]  R. Rivlin Torsion of a Rubber Cylinder , 1947 .

[43]  Francisco Chinesta,et al.  A Manifold Learning Approach to Data-Driven Computational Elasticity and Inelasticity , 2016, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[44]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  A model of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic material behavior using spline interpolations of tension–compression test data , 2009 .

[45]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .