Nordic Administrative Collaboration: Scope, Predictors and Effects on Policy Design and Administrative Reform Measures

This article examines whether Nordic administrative collaboration is still ‘alive and kicking,’ or whether it has been marginalized by increased integration into Europe and strong international reform trajectories. We analyse the scope and intensity of Nordic administrative collaboration from a structural perspective based on the perceptions of civil servants in the Norwegian central government. We also address the implications of Nordic collaboration for policy design and reform measures. The main conclusion is that Nordic administrative collaboration can best be described as differentiated integration. The scope of Nordic administrative collaboration is rather broad, and its internal structural features vary significantly. Nordic collaboration is perceived to have more of an effect on policy design than on specific administrative reform means and measures. However, structural features also matter.

[1]  C. Greve,et al.  Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments , 2020, International Journal of Public Administration.

[2]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Balancing Governance Capacity and Legitimacy: How the Norwegian Government Handled the COVID‐19 Crisis as a High Performer , 2020, Public administration review.

[3]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Organization Theory and the Public Sector , 2020 .

[4]  I. Bleiklie,et al.  Scandinavian Higher Education Governance—Pursuing Similar Goals Through Different Organizational Arrangements , 2019, European Policy Analysis.

[5]  Stefan Gänzle,et al.  Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post‐Brexit European Union , 2019, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.

[6]  L. G. White,et al.  Administrative Behavior , 2019, Managing Development in the Third World.

[7]  H. F. Hansen,et al.  Evidence producing organizations: Organizational translation of travelling evaluation ideas , 2018, Evaluation.

[8]  C. Greve,et al.  Nordic Bureaucracy beyond New Public Management , 2018, Comparative Social Research.

[9]  Jarle Trondal,et al.  An Organizational Approach to Public Governance , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[10]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Reforming the Norwegian police between structure and culture: Community police or emergency police , 2018 .

[11]  M. Pym.  Book review: the Nordic models in political science: challenged, but still viable? edited by Oddbjørn Knutsen , 2018 .

[12]  Per Lægreid.  Nordic administrative traditions , 2017 .

[13]  C. Ansell,et al.  Governance in Turbulent Times , 2016 .

[14]  Per Lægreid,et al.  Coordination challenges and administrative reforms , 2016 .

[15]  A. Jordan.  The problem-solving capacity of the modern state: governance challenges and administrative capacities , 2016 .

[16]  M. Kristiansen.  Management by Objectives and Results in the Nordic Countries: Continuity and Change, Differences and Similarities , 2015 .

[17]  Kai Wegrich,et al.  Management Capacity and Performance in European Public Administrations1 , 2014 .

[18]  Berthold. Rittberger,et al.  The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicization and differentiation , 2014 .

[19]  Per Lægreid.  Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms , 2013 .

[20]  B. Peters,et al.  THE RISE OF EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE: LESSONS LEARNED , 2012 .

[21]  Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL LEGACY EFFECTS: THREE PROPOSITIONS ON THE IMPACT OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITIONS ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN EUROPE EAST AND WEST , 2011 .

[22]  H. F. Hansen.  NPM in Scandinavia , 2010 .

[23]  Johan P. Olsen.  Governing through Institution Building , 2010 .

[24]  Haim H. Permuter,et al.  Coordination Capacity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[25]  H. F. Hansen.  Educational Evaluation in Scandinavian Countries: Converging or Diverging Practices? , 2009 .

[26]  Per Lægreid,et al.  Regulation for Safe Food: A Comparison of Five European Countries , 2008 .

[27]  Ingrid Helgøy,et al.  Towards a New Professionalism in School? A Comparative Study of Teacher Autonomy in Norway and Sweden , 2007 .

[28]  Paul G. Roness,et al.  Performance Management in Practice: the Norwegian Way , 2006 .

[29]  Jarmo Vakkuri,et al.  IS THERE A NORDIC PERSPECTIVE ON PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[30]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  Europeanization and Transnational States: Comparing Nordic Central Governments , 2003 .

[31]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Towards a European administrative space? , 2003 .

[32]  Hussein Kassim.  The National Co-ordination of EU Policy , 2000 .

[33]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  The Reforming Organization. , 1996 .

[34]  S Noble,et al.  Management by objectives. , 1983, Topics in hospital pharmacy management.

[35]  M. Khan.  Administrative Reform , 1978 .

[36]  Bengt Jacobsson,et al.  Tjugofem år av gemenskap : Statsförvaltningen och Europeiska unionen , 2020 .

[37]  C. Greve,et al.  Nordic Administrative Reforms: Lessons for Public Management , 2016 .

[38]  Helena Wockelberg,et al.  Nordic Administrative Heritages and Contemporary Institutional Design , 2016 .

[39]  Per Lægreid,et al.  Administrative Reform: Processes, Trends, and Content , 2016 .

[40]  Jarle Trondal,et al.  The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system , 2015 .

[41]  Héctor Arámbula.  Reseña de "Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms" de Tom Christensen y Per Lægreid (eds.) , 2009 .

[42]  Jenny M. Lewis.  Organization theory and the public sector , 2008 .

[43]  A. Krueger,et al.  The Market Comes to Education in Sweden , 2005 .

[44]  M. Egeberg.  How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective , 2003 .

[45]  Christoph Knill.  The Europeanisation of National Administrations , 2001 .

[46]  Ove K. Pedersen,et al.  Europaveje : EU i de nordiske centralforvaltninger , 2001 .

[47]  B. Peters,et al.  The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: the domestic level , 2000 .

[48]  Malin Wreder,et al.  Public Management Reform , 2000 .