Weighting Spatial Information in GIS for Copper Mining Exploration

Exploration of new mines is vitally important for human life. Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) can be effectively used in the gathering, weighting, analyzing and presenting spatial and attribute information to facilitate the mine exploration process. The success of mine exploration largely depends on: the identification of governing factors, the determination of their impacts and the selection of suitable models to integrate the parameters. Weighting methods are classified into two main groups: data-driven and knowledge-driven. Six weighting methods are identified and scientifically assessed in this study, namely; Ratio Estimation, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Delphi, Weight of Evidence, Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The first three are examples of knowledge-driven and the last three are classified in the data-driven group. In order to evaluate the methods, the information of 26 copper boreholes are used. Numerical experimentations showed that the artificial neural network used in this study is the most accurate method because it could predict the characteristics of all boreholes correctly. It is shown that knowledge-driven methods are very much affected by the degree of knowledge and the specialization of experts. The results indicated that AHP is the most successful method among knowledge-driven class and could predict the characteristics of 82% of boreholes correctly.

[1]  Paola Ligas,et al.  An integrated application of geological–geophysical methodologies as a cost-efficient tool in improving the estimation of clay deposit potential: Case study from South-Central Sardinia (Italy) , 2006 .

[2]  Sukumar Bandopadhyay,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Neural Network Learning Algorithms for Ore Grade Estimation , 2006 .

[3]  C. Ayday,et al.  Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using Geographical Information Systems based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  A. Ford,et al.  Combining fractal analysis of mineral deposit clustering with weights of evidence to evaluate patterns of mineralization: Application to copper deposits of the Mount Isa Inlier, NW Queensland, Australia , 2008 .

[5]  J. Harris,et al.  Effective use and interpretation of lithogeochemical data in regional mineral exploration programs: application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology☆ , 2000 .

[6]  J. Harris,et al.  Application of GIS Processing Techniques for Producing Mineral Prospectivity Maps—A Case Study: Mesothermal Au in the Swayze Greenstone Belt, Ontario, Canada , 2001 .

[7]  Gang Chen,et al.  GIS application in mineral resource analysis - A case study of offshore marine placer gold at Nome, Alaska , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Martin Hale,et al.  A predictive GIS model for mapping potential gold and base metal mineralization in Takab area, Iran , 2001 .

[9]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[10]  E. Carranza,et al.  Where Are Porphyry Copper Deposits Spatially Localized? A Case Study in Benguet Province, Philippines , 2002 .

[11]  Thomas Jackson,et al.  Neural Computing - An Introduction , 1990 .

[12]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[13]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Conditional Independence Test for Weights-of-Evidence Modeling , 2002 .

[14]  George Wright,et al.  Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique , 2001 .

[15]  Manoj K. Arora,et al.  A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas , 2006 .

[16]  L. Bailly,et al.  Predictive mapping for copper-gold magmatic-hydrothermal systems in NW Argentina: Use of a regional-scale GIS, application of an expert-guided data-driven approach, and comparison with results from a continental-scale GIS , 2006 .

[17]  Tom Gedeon,et al.  Use of Fuzzy Membership Input Layers to Combine Subjective Geological Knowledge and Empirical Data in a Neural Network Method for Mineral-Potential Mapping , 2003 .

[18]  S. R. Huang.  Application of optimum stratified sampling and separate ratio estimation in stochastic copper loss of transmission system evaluation , 1997 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[20]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks for Mineral-Potential Mapping: A Case Study from Aravalli Province, Western India , 2003 .

[21]  Veselka Boeva,et al.  Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Yongliang Chen.  MRPM: three visual basic programs for mineral resource potential mapping , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  Sandra Luque,et al.  Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest. , 2006 .

[24]  G. Bonham-Carter.  Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS , 1995 .

[25]  Jib Fowles,et al.  Handbook of Futures Research , 1978 .

[26]  Alok Porwal,et al.  Knowledge-Driven and Data-Driven Fuzzy Models for Predictive Mineral Potential Mapping , 2003 .

[27]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[28]  Tom Gedeon,et al.  Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2000 .