Contexts of Relevance in Explanatory Case Studies in Information Systems: Ubiquitous Information Technology Implementation in Organizations

Case studies of the organizational implementation of traditional business computing have often emphasized the importance of context in research design and data analysis. The emergence of computing phenomena that pervade different contexts within and even beyond the organizational boundary suggests the need to disaggregate the notion of context to allow for finer levels of contextual analysis. Indeed we demonstrate that a failure to consider interdependent levels of context in organizational case studies of computing technologies that even approach ubiquity runs the risk of partial and even incorrect conclusions being drawn. We illustrate this argument by means of two explanatory case studies of intranet and mobile technology implementation in organizations. Based on the extant literature on context in case study design and examples drawn from the cases, we propose a range of interconnected and interrelated contexts to consider in the research design of explanatory cases of ubiquitous technology implementation in organizations.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Brave New World of development in the internetwork computing architecture (InterNCA): or how distributed computing platforms will change systems development , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Helen Z. Margetts,et al.  Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Yasmin Merali Information Systems Development Systems: What Gives? , 1993 .

[4]  Blake Ives,et al.  Introducing Transformational Information Technologies: The Case of the World Wide Web Technology , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[5]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model , 1990 .

[6]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Issues and Challenges in Ubiquitous Computing , 2002 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[8]  A. Pettigrew Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes , 1985 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Designing Calm Technology , 2004 .

[11]  Roberta Lamb,et al.  The New Computing Archipelago: Intranet Islands of Practice , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[12]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems in organization theory: a review , 1987 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[15]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Assessment of Technology In Organizations: Closed versus Open Systems Approach , 1979 .

[17]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[19]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Key roles in intranet implementation: the conquest and the aftermath , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[20]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[21]  Helana Scheepers,et al.  Mobile technology use landscape: convergence of the organisation and personal context , 2002 .

[22]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[23]  Mark J. Safferstone Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[25]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[26]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[27]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[28]  Allen S. Lee Case Studies as Natural Experiments , 1989 .

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[30]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[31]  D. Rousseau Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[32]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[34]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development: an application of a social process model , 1996, TOIS.

[35]  S. Robbins Organization theory: Structure, design, and applications , 1987 .

[36]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[38]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[39]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[40]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[41]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Determinants of intranet diffusion and infusion , 2001 .

[43]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  R. Kling,et al.  Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .

[45]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[46]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Guidelines for Conducting Positivist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[48]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work , 2002, CACM.

[49]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Implementation Processes Based on Sequences of Events in Information System Development , 1993 .

[50]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[51]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[52]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[53]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[54]  R. Boland Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[55]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Power, influence and intranet implementation: A safari of South African organizations , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[56]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Managing the crises in intranet implementation: a stage model , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[58]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing , 1993, CACM.

[59]  Varun Grover,et al.  Exploring Mediation Between Environmental and Structural Attributes: The Penetration of Communication Technologies in Manufacturing Organizations , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[61]  Helana Scheepers,et al.  The Hidden Impact of Mobile Information Systems: a case study of social interaction , 2002 .

[62]  Helana Scheepers,et al.  Emerging trends in mobile technology development: from healthcare professional to system developer , 2003 .

[63]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environments , 2002, CACM.

[65]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..