Implementation of Selenium with JUNIT and Test -Ng

Software testing is complex and time consuming. One way to reduce the effort associated with testin g is to generate test data automatically. Testing is very important part of software development. Quality is not an absolute term; it is value to some person. W ith that in mind, testing can never completely establis h the correctness of arbitrary computer software test ing furnishes a criticism or comparison that compares t he state and behavior of the product against a specification. Software testing process can produce several artifacts. So, we proposed a model to impro ve quality and correctness and also we reduce the software testing time. In this paper we will implement selenium with different frameworks i.e. junit and testng. Keyword:-Selenium, SeleniumRC, Junit, TestNG.

[1]  Wahyu Kusuma,et al.  Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , 2012 .

[2]  Stefan P. Jaskiel,et al.  Systematic Software Testing , 2002 .

[3]  Pankaj Mudholkar,et al.  Software Testing , 2002, Computer.

[4]  Goutam Kumar Saha,et al.  Understanding software testing concepts , 2008, UBIQ.

[5]  Supratik Mukhopadhyay,et al.  RETNA: from requirements to testing in a natural way , 2004, Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2004..

[6]  Bruno Legeard,et al.  A taxonomy of model-based testing , 2006 .

[7]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Test-driven development as a defect-reduction practice , 2003, 14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2003. ISSRE 2003..

[8]  Ron Patton,et al.  Software Testing , 2000 .

[9]  S. Reid.  The Art of Software Testing, Second edition. Glenford J. Myers. Revised and updated by Tom Badgett and Todd M. Thomas, with Corey Sandler. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, U.S.A., 2004. ISBN: 0-471-46912-2, pp 234: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[10]  Stefan Wagner,et al.  Software quality economics for defect-detection techniques using failure prediction , 2005, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes.

[11]  Stefan Wagner,et al.  Software quality economics for defect-detection techniques using failure prediction , 2005 .

[12]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Reconciling Manual and Automated Testing: The AutoTest Experience , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[13]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Test-driven Development - by example , 2002, The Addison-Wesley signature series.

[14]  Mary Lou Soffa,et al.  TimeAware test suite prioritization , 2006, ISSTA '06.

[15]  Robyn R. Lutz,et al.  Requirements discovery during the testing of safety-critical software , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[16]  Neelam Gupta,et al.  Test Case Prioritization Using Relevant Slices , 2006, 30th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'06).

[17]  Stefan Berner,et al.  Observations and lessons learned from automated testing , 2005, Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005..

[18]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  The ROI of software dependability: The iDAVE model , 2004, IEEE Software.

[19]  S. Berner,et al.  Observations and lessons learned from automated testing , 2005, Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005..

[20]  J.-C. Froidure,et al.  FTTx automated test solution : Requirements and experimental implementation , 2005 .

[21]  Myra B. Cohen,et al.  Testing across configurations: implications for combinatorial testing , 2006, SOEN.