Digital storytelling and memory institutions: A case study using activity theory

This paper describes a case study investigation of a city‐wide digital storytelling initiative led by two libraries and one municipal cultural department in Hamilton, Canada. Data collection involved one‐on‐one interviews, document review, and participant observations with governance stakeholders from the two libraries and municipal cultural department involved in the case study. Using activity theory as a conceptual framework, data were analyzed using grounded theory techniques. A variety of factors – motivations, goals, actions, tools, rules, divisions of labour, tensions and contradictions – were found to influence the implementation of the digital storytelling initiative under investigation. Importantly, activity theory provided a robust, holistic framework for understanding and describing the phenomenon of digital storytelling initiatives led by memory institutions.

[1]  N. Redeker,et al.  Perspectives on Activity , 1994, Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice.

[2]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Activity Theory: who is doing what, why and how , 2014 .

[3]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[4]  Joe Lambert,et al.  Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community , 2002 .

[5]  O. Bertelsen,et al.  Activity Theory , 2003 .

[6]  B. Nardi.  Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[7]  V. Kaptelinin.  The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[8]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Developing activity theory in information studies (DATIS) , 2016 .

[9]  John Hartley,et al.  Story Circle: Digital Storytelling around the World , 2009 .

[10]  Merja Helle,et al.  Disturbances and Contradictions as Tools for Understanding Work in the Newsroom , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Nick Couldry,et al.  Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling , 2008, New Media Soc..

[12]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[13]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Information Systems Journal Special Issue on: Activity Theory in Information Systems Research , 2015, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[15]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[16]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[17]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[18]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[19]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  ICT for development in the context of the closure of Chernobyl nuclear power plant: an activity theory perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Archives : principles and practices , 2011 .

[21]  Tom Wilson,et al.  Review of: Wilson, T. D. (Ed.). Theory in information behaviour research. Sheffield, UK: Eiconics Ltd. , 2013 .

[22]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory , 2006, Inf. Res..

[23]  John Hartley,et al.  Computational power meets human contact , 2009 .

[24]  Brenton D. Faber.  Book Review: Storytelling in Business: The Authentic and Fluent Organization , 2015 .

[25]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .