The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part II. A Systematic Evaluation across 58 Patient Models.

Purpose To estimate the radiation dose as a result of contrast medium administration in a typical abdominal computed tomographic (CT) examination across a library of contrast material-enhanced computational patient models. Materials and Methods In part II of this study, first, the technique described in part I of this study was applied to enhance the extended cardiac-torso models with patient-specific iodine-time profiles reflecting the administration of contrast material. Second, the patient models were deployed to assess the patient-specific organ dose as a function of time in a typical abdominal CT examination using Monte Carlo simulation. In this hypothesis-generating study, organ dose refers to the total energy deposited in the unit mass of the tissue inclusive of iodine. Third, a study was performed as a strategy to anticipate the biologically relevant dose (absorbed dose to tissue) in highly perfused organs such as the liver and kidney. The time-varying organ-dose increment values relative to those for unenhanced CT examinations were reported. Results The results from the patient models subjected to the injection protocol indicated up to a total 53%, 30%, 35%, 54%, 27%, 18%, 17%, and 24% increase in radiation dose delivered to the heart, spleen, liver, kidneys, stomach, colon, small intestine, and pancreas, respectively. The biologically relevant dose increase with respect to the dose at an unenhanced CT examination was in the range of 0%-18% increase for the liver and 27% for the kidney across 58 patient models. Conclusion The administration of contrast medium increases the total radiation dose. However, radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, may still not fully characterize the total biologic effects. Therefore, given the fact that many CT diagnostic decisions would be impossible without the use of iodine, this study suggests the need to consider the effect of iodinated contrast material on the organ doses to patients undergoing CT studies when designing CT protocols. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  Johannes T Heverhagen,et al.  The presence of iodinated contrast agents amplifies DNA radiation damage in computed tomography. , 2011, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Determination of contrast media administration to achieve a targeted contrast enhancement in computed tomography , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[3]  H. Garnica-Garza Contrast-enhanced radiotherapy: feasibility and characteristics of the physical absorbed dose distribution for deep-seated tumors , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Michael Uder,et al.  Contrast medium-enhanced radiation damage caused by CT examinations. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  V F Cassola,et al.  FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: I. Development of the anatomy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Johannes T. Heverhagen,et al.  Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Agents Amplify DNA Radiation Damage at CT. , 2015, Radiology.

[7]  J. Bushberg The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2001 .

[8]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  D Broggio,et al.  Treatment plans optimization for contrast-enhanced synchrotron stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Dosimetric and microdosimetric study of contrast-enhanced radiotherapy with kilovolt x-rays , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  M. Gaeta,et al.  Can contrast media increase organ doses in CT examinations? A clinical study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  T Solberg,et al.  First radiotherapy of human metastatic brain tumors delivered by a computerized tomography scanner (CTRx). , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  Johannes T. Heverhagen,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. , 2008, Radiology.

[16]  Daniel Lodwick,et al.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  J Winter,et al.  Radiation dose enhancement in tumors with iodine. , 1983, Medical physics.

[18]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Dose coefficients in pediatric and adult abdominopelvic CT based on 100 patient models , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  Michael Uder,et al.  In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  A Monte Carlo Comparison of Three Different Media for Contrast Enhanced Radiotherapy of the Prostate , 2010, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[22]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[23]  W. Paul Segars,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients. , 2010, Medical physics.

[24]  B Geiger,et al.  ICRP Publication 120: Radiological Protection in Cardiology , 2013, Annals of the ICRP.