An analytical model to evaluating the implementation of a batch-production-oriented line

Abstract This paper presents a new approach to evaluating the suitability of implementing a batch-production-oriented manufacturing line. The Characteristic Curve (CC) as introduced by Deming [Deming, D.D., 1959. When to shift to straight-line production. Harvard Business Review 38, 62–68.] is an efficient tool for determining the number of machines belonging to each station in single-model production lines. Because such an approach does not consider set-up times, it is inappropriate for batch-production-oriented lines. A new methodology is presented named Distributed Set-up times Characteristic Curve (DSCC) which enables application of the CC to manufacturing lines organized on a batch-production system. The innovation introduced is an analytical model able to consider frequent set-ups, such as those caused by batch switching. The importance of the proposed technique for production system designers is the speed of analysis and the possibility of avoiding simulations as presented in the case study application, where the optimal organization of a steel pipe manufacturing line is explored. Specifically, by analyzing technical and economical performance indicators, the optimal number of laser bits, curling machines, bar folders and welders belonging to manufacturing stations, along with the suggested size of production batches to be adopted, are evaluated.

[1]  Sheng-Jen Hsieh Hybrid analytic and simulation models for assembly line design and production planning , 2002, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[2]  Armin Scholl,et al.  A note on "An exact method for cost-oriented assembly line balancing" , 2005 .

[3]  A. Delchambre,et al.  Hybrid assembly line design and user's preferences , 2002 .

[4]  David P. Christy,et al.  Evaluating the design of flexible manufacturing systems , 1992 .

[5]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Assembly line balancing with parallel workstations and dead time , 1989 .

[6]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  An Integer Programming Procedure for Assembly System Design Problems , 2011, Oper. Res..

[7]  Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.  An integrated design support method for flexible assembly systems , 1996 .

[8]  Michael C. Burstein,et al.  A concurrent development tool for flexible assembly systems , 1992 .

[9]  Matthias Amen,et al.  An exact method for cost-oriented assembly line balancing , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Equipment selection and task assignment for multiproduct assembly system design , 1988 .

[11]  Ezey M. Dar-El,et al.  Mixed model assembly line design in a make-to-order environment , 2002 .

[12]  Patrick R. McMullen,et al.  A heuristic for solving mixed-model line balancing problems with stochastic task durations and parallel stations , 1997 .

[13]  W. Wilhelm,et al.  Assembly System Design: a Branch and Cut Approach , 1998 .

[14]  Peter A. Pinto,et al.  Assembly Line Balancing with Processing Alternatives: An Application , 1983 .

[15]  Chun-Hsiung Lan,et al.  The maximal profit flow model in designing multiple-production-line system with obtainable resource capacity , 2001 .

[16]  Patrick R. McMullen,et al.  Using simulated annealing to solve a multiobjective assembly line balancing problem with parallel workstations , 1998 .

[17]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Optimal design of stochastic production lines: a dynamic programming approach , 2002 .

[18]  Ford W. Harris,et al.  How Many Parts to Make at Once , 1990, Oper. Res..

[19]  John M. Wilson,et al.  The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms , 2003 .

[20]  Yohanan Arzi,et al.  Optimal design of flexible production lines with unreliable machines and infinite buffers , 1998 .

[21]  Divakar Rajamani,et al.  A Simulation Approach to the Design of an Assembly Line: A Case Study , 1991 .