The role of lysine 55 in determining the specificity of the purine repressor for its operators through minor groove interactions.

The interaction of the dimeric Escherichia coli purine repressor (PurR) with its cognate sequences leads to a 45 degrees to 50 degrees kink at a central CpG base step towards the major groove, as dyad-related leucine side-chains interdigitate between these bases from the minor groove. The resulting broadening of the minor groove increases the accessibility of the six central base-pairs towards minor groove interactions with residues from PurR. It has been shown that lysine 55 of PurR makes a direct contact with the adenine base (Ade8) directly 5' to the central CpG base-pair step in the high-affinity purF operator sequence. We have investigated the importance of this interaction in the specificity and affinity of wild-type PurR (WT) for its operators and we have studied a mutant of PurR in which Lys55 is replaced with alanine (K55A). Complexes of WT and K55A with duplex DNA containing pur operator sequences varied at position 8 were investigated crystallographically, and binding studies were performed using fluorescence anisotropy. The structures of the protein-DNA complexes reveal a relatively unperturbed global conformation regardless of the identity of the base-pair at position 8 or residue 55. In all structures the combination of higher resolution and a palindromic purF operator site allowed several new PurR.DNA interactions to be observed, including contacts by Thr15, Thr16 and His20. The side-chain of Lys55 makes productive, though varying, interactions with the adenine, thymine or cytosine base at position 8 that result in equilibrium dissociation constants of 2.6 nM, 10 nM and 35 nM, respectively. However, the bulk of the lysine side-chain apparently blocks high-affinity binding of operators with guanine at position 8 (Kd620 nM). Also, the high-affinity binding conformation appears blocked, as crystals of WT bound to DNA with guanine at position 8 could not be grown. In complexes containing K55A, the alanine side-chain is too far removed to engage in van der Waals interactions with the operator, and, with the loss of the general electrostatic interaction between the phosphate backbone and the ammonium group of lysine, K55A binds each operator weakly. However, the mutation leads to a swap of specificity of PurR for the base at position 8, with K55A exhibiting a twofold preference for guanine over adenine. In addition to defining the role of Lys55 in PurR minor groove binding, these studies provide structural insight into the minor groove binding specificities of other LacI/GalR family members that have either alanine (e.g. LacI, GalR, CcpA) or a basic residue (e.g. RafR, ScrR, RbtR) at the comparable position.

[1]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Intercalation, DNA Kinking, and the Control of Transcription , 1996, Science.

[2]  M. Schumacher,et al.  The X-ray Structure of the PurR-Guanine-purF Operator Complex Reveals the Contributions of Complementary Electrostatic Surfaces and a Water-mediated Hydrogen Bond to Corepressor Specificity and Binding Affinity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Stefan Knapp,et al.  Architecture of nonspecific protein–DNA interactions in the Sso7d–DNA complex , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  P B Sigler,et al.  The crystal structure of a hyperthermophilic archaeal TATA-box binding protein. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  H. Margalit,et al.  A role for CH...O interactions in protein-DNA recognition. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  M. Lewis,et al.  Escherichia coli lac repressor-lac operator interaction and the influence of allosteric effectors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  A. Travers,et al.  Reading the minor groove , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  N. Seeman,et al.  Sequence-specific Recognition of Double Helical Nucleic Acids by Proteins (base Pairs/hydrogen Bonding/recognition Fidelity/ion Binding) , 2022 .

[9]  J. M. Buchanan CHAPTER 35 – Biosynthesis of Purine Nucleotides* , 1960 .

[10]  Aneel K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax–Extradenticle homeodomain complex , 1999, Nature.

[11]  K. Y. Choi,et al.  Role of the purine repressor hinge sequence in repressor function , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  M. Schumacher,et al.  A Positively Charged Residue Bound in the Minor Groove Does not Alter the Bending of a DNA Duplex , 1996 .

[13]  D. Wemmer,et al.  Targeting the minor groove of DNA. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  G G Hu,et al.  The B-DNA dodecamer at high resolution reveals a spine of water on sodium. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[16]  J. Sadler,et al.  A perfectly symmetric lac operator binds the lac repressor very tightly. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase gamma delta resolvase complexed with a 34 bp cleavage site. , 1996, Cell.

[18]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex , 1995, Cell.

[19]  L. Lim,et al.  The crystal structure of the hyperthermophile chromosomal protein Sso7d bound to DNA , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  Li Zhang,et al.  Structure of a HAP1–DNA complex reveals dramatically asymmetric DNA binding by a homodimeric protein , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[21]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Crystal structure of LacI member, PurR, bound to DNA: minor groove binding by alpha helices. , 1994, Science.

[22]  G. Chang,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer , 1996, Science.

[23]  H Zalkin,et al.  Structure-based redesign of corepressor specificity of the Escherichia coli purine repressor by substitution of residue 190. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[24]  Wei Yang,et al.  Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase γδ resolvase complexed with a 34 by cleavage site , 1995, Cell.

[25]  R. Sauer,et al.  Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. , 1992, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Structural comparison of the free and DNA-bound forms of the purine repressor DNA-binding domain. , 1995, Structure.

[27]  V. P. Chuprina,et al.  Structure of the complex of lac repressor headpiece and an 11 base-pair half-operator determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and restrained molecular dynamics. , 1994, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[28]  Bhyravabhotla Jayaram,et al.  Intrusion of Counterions into the Spine of Hydration in the Minor Groove of B-DNA: Fractional Occupancy of Electronegative Pockets , 1997 .

[29]  R. Lavery,et al.  The dependence of the surface electrostatic potential of B-DNA on environmental factors. , 1985, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[30]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[31]  H. Berman,et al.  Analysis of local helix bending in crystal structures of DNA oligonucleotides and DNA-protein complexes. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[32]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of an Escherichia coli purine repressor-hypoxanthine-DNA complex. , 1994, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[33]  B. Hartmann,et al.  Structural behavior of the CpG step in two related oligonucleotides reflects its malleability in solution. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[34]  K. Y. Choi,et al.  Structural characterization and corepressor binding of the Escherichia coli purine repressor , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  Steven Hahn,et al.  Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex , 1993, Nature.

[36]  M. Slijper,et al.  Refined structure of lac repressor headpiece (1-56) determined by relaxation matrix calculations from 2D and 3D NOE data: change of tertiary structure upon binding to the lac operator. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  L. J. Maher,et al.  DNA bending by asymmetric phosphate neutralization. , 1994, Science.

[38]  Fluorescence polarization analysis of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Molecular endocrinology.

[39]  R Lavery,et al.  The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[40]  R. Rolfes,et al.  Purification of the Escherichia coli purine regulon repressor and identification of corepressors , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  R. Dickerson,et al.  The structure of B-helical C-G-A-T-C-G-A-T-C-G and comparison with C-C-A-A-C-G-T-T-G-G. The effect of base pair reversals. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element , 1993, Nature.

[43]  Ronen Marmorstein,et al.  Crystal structure of a PUT3–DNA complex reveals a novel mechanism for DMA recognition by a protein containing a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[44]  Martin Egli,et al.  A "Hydrat-Ion" Spine in a B-DNA Minor Groove , 1999 .

[45]  Brian W. Matthews,et al.  An efficient general-purpose least-squares refinement program for macromolecular structures , 1987 .

[46]  M. Saier,et al.  Phylogenetic, structural and functional analyses of the LacI‐GalR family of bacterial transcription factors , 1995, FEBS letters.

[47]  David A. Case,et al.  Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1 , 1995, Nature.

[48]  M. Cleary,et al.  Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA Role of the Hexapeptide and a Fourth Homeodomain Helix in Complex Formation , 1999, Cell.

[49]  H. Zalkin,et al.  Repression of Escherichia coli purB is by a transcriptional roadblock mechanism , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[50]  Ernest Fraenkel,et al.  Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures for the Antennapedia homeodomain–DNA complex , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. , 1994, Science.

[52]  M. A. Fabian,et al.  Electrostatic mechanism for DNA bending by bZIP proteins. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[53]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. , 1991, Cell.

[54]  P. Sigler,et al.  DNA-binding mechanism of the monomeric orphan nuclear receptor NGFI-B , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[55]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  The MIDAS display system , 1988 .

[56]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 Å resolution: A framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions , 1990, Cell.

[57]  Jeffrey R. Huth,et al.  The solution structure of an HMG-I(Y)–DNA complex defines a new architectural minor groove binding motif , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[58]  S. Adhya,et al.  A family of bacterial regulators homologous to Gal and Lac repressors. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[59]  Song Tan,et al.  Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA , 1995, Nature.

[60]  S. Phillips Built by association: structure and function of helix-loop-helix DNA-binding proteins. , 1994, Structure.

[61]  Fu Lu,et al.  The structure of PurR mutant L54M shows an alternative route to DNA kinking , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[62]  Stephen K Burley,et al.  Architectural Transcription Factors: Proteins That-Remodel DNA , 1997, Cell.