An Assessment of the Current State of Spatial Data Sharing in Rwanda

Geographic information is becoming more important everyday at all levels of society. It has a central role in supporting economies, improving business effectiveness in the private sector, enabling more efficient decision making and increasing citizens’ involvement in governance. The need to share becomes apparent when individuals and organisations cannot produce all datasets they need. Identifying current data sharing arrangements is pivotal to understanding the kind of sharing mechanism required. An assessment of data sharing in Rwanda was made by surveying organisations producing and/or using spatial datasets in their daily activities. Key areas covered include organisational approaches used and inhibitions to spatial data sharing. The main spatial data producers were identified as they exert enormous influence on the data sharing process. Results reveal that the main datasets shared are administrative boundaries, topographic maps and orthophotos. Most spatial data are exchanged as printed maps, implying that the data management system is predominantly paper based. Furthermore, findings show that majority of data users in Rwanda are decision makers. Data producers and users perceive the absence of a national policy on data access and sharing as the main impediment to sharing in Rwanda. Consequently, sharing modalities are very informal, with friendship, goodwill and organisation’s propensity to share identified as major considerations influencing decision to share data. Based on survey findings, different data sharing policy options were proposed. This assessment of the state of data sharing in Rwanda helps to identify current arrangements of spatial data exchange.

[1]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Local‐government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Malcolm D. Evans,et al.  African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights , 2012 .

[3]  F. Harvey Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: the role of trust , 2003 .

[4]  Giannis Tzimas,et al.  Interoperability and Design Issues of Spatial Data and Geographic Information Systems in Greece , 2010, 2010 14th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics.

[5]  Clarisse Kagoyire,et al.  The Rwanda Metadata Portal: A Web Catalogue Service , 2010, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[6]  Michael Wilson,et al.  SDI in East Africa - Leveraging the UN presence , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[7]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  CREATING AN ENABLING PLATFORM FOR THE DELIVERY OF SPATIAL INFORMATION , 2005 .

[8]  Joep Crompvoets,et al.  A characterization of Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010, GIScience 2010.

[9]  David O. Yawson,et al.  Ghana's Right to Information Bill: Opportunity for SDI as a Technical Infrastructure , 2010, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[10]  El-Sayed Ewis Omran,et al.  Spatial data sharing: from theory to practice , 2007 .

[11]  Henry Adobor Optimal trust? Uncertainty as a determinant and limit to trust in inter‐firm alliances , 2006 .

[12]  Massimo Craglia,et al.  Introduction to the International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research , 2006, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[13]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure , 2008 .

[14]  Vlado Cetl,et al.  Creation of an NSDI strategy - Case Study Croatia , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[15]  David Wilson,et al.  Local Government in the United Kingdom , 1994 .

[16]  Kevin McDougall,et al.  Volunteered geographic information for building SDI , 2009 .

[17]  S. Eckardt Political accountability, fiscal conditions and local government performance—cross‐sectional evidence from Indonesia , 2008 .

[18]  J. Pinto,et al.  GIS Database Development and Exchange: Interaction Mechanisms and Motivations , 2011 .

[19]  Sarah Elwood Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  James Campbell,et al.  Towards Voluntary Interoperable Open Access Licenses for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[21]  A. Rajabifard,et al.  Land Administration and Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2005 .

[22]  Mike Jackson,et al.  The Evolution of Geospatial Technology Calls for Changes in Geospatial Research , Education and Government Management , 2009 .