Investment Decisions and Time Horizon: Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Repeated Gambles

To investigate the effect of time horizon on investment behavior, this paper reports the results of an experiment in which business graduate students provided certainty equivalents and judged various dimensions of the outcome distribution of simple gambles that were played either once or repeatedly for 5 or 50 times. Systematic mistakes in the ex-ante estimations of the distributions of outcomes after (independent) repeated plays were observed. Despite correctly realizing that outcome standard deviation increases with the number of plays, respondents showed evidence of Samuelson's (1963) fallacy of large numbers. Perceived risk judgments showed only low correlations with standard deviation estimates, but were instead related to the anticipated probability of a loss (which was overestimated), mean excess loss, and the coefficient of variation. Implications for future research and practical implications for financial advisors are discussed.

[1]  D. Medin,et al.  Decision making from a cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[2]  Terri L. Moore,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 2001, Technometrics.

[3]  Martin Weber,et al.  What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty? , 1998, Manag. Sci..

[4]  E U Weber,et al.  Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[6]  Martin Weber Decision and Choice: Risk, Theories , 2001 .

[7]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk , 1997 .

[8]  Alexander Klos The investment horizon and dynamic asset allocation—some experimental evidence , 2004 .

[9]  E. Weber,et al.  Cognition-mediated coevolution – context-dependent evaluations and sensitivity of pollinators to variability in nectar rewards , 2003, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[10]  E. Weber,et al.  Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice , 1997 .

[11]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  A descriptive measure of risk , 1988 .

[12]  Martin Weber,et al.  Prospect Theory, Mental Accounting, and Differences in Aggregated and Segregated Evaluation of Lottery Portfolios , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Martin Weber,et al.  Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss aversion: how general is the phenomenon? , 2005 .

[14]  E. B. Page Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear Ranks , 1963 .

[15]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Risk-value models , 1993 .

[16]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[17]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Overconfidence and trading volume , 2003 .

[18]  E. Weber,et al.  Risk: Empirical Studies on Decision and Choice , 2001 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[20]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  James W. Gentry,et al.  Risk perception in a simulated industrial purchasing task: The Effects of single versus multi-play decisions , 1990 .

[23]  E. Weber,et al.  Content and Discontent: Indications and Implications of Domain Specificity in Preferential Decision Making , 1995 .

[24]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  The Role of Aspiration Level in Risky Choice: A Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Theory and SP/A Theory. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[25]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  An axiomatic theory of conjoint expected risk , 1986 .

[26]  P. Samuelson Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[27]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Mark Kritzman What practitioners need to know . . . About time diversification , 1994 .

[29]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Raimond Maurer,et al.  Shortfall-Risks of Stocks in the Long Run , 2005 .

[31]  E. Weber,et al.  Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation , 2004, Psychological review.

[32]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[33]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[34]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Communicating asset risk: how the format of historic volatility information affects risk perception and investment decisions , 2000 .

[35]  Shlomo Benartzi,et al.  How Much is Investor Autonomy Worth? , 2001 .

[36]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  The Utility of Measuring and Modeling Perceived Risk , 2019, Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce.

[37]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Gambling decisions and information about expected value. , 1982 .

[38]  E. Weber,et al.  Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  R. Thaler,et al.  Risk Aversion Or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments , 1999 .

[40]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[41]  L. ROBINKELLER,et al.  Empirical Investigation of Some Properties of the Perceived Riskiness of Gambles , 2003 .

[42]  M. Weber,et al.  Risk: Theories of Decision and Choice , 2001 .

[43]  D. Asch,et al.  Are medical treatments for individuals and groups like single-play and multiple-play gambles? , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[44]  E. Weber,et al.  A Theory of Perceived Risk and Attractiveness , 1992 .

[45]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[46]  M. Rabin Psychology and Economics , 1997 .

[47]  Mark Kritzman,et al.  The Mismeasurement of Risk , 2002 .

[48]  Alexander Klos,et al.  Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Non-Tradable Income: An Experimental Analysis , 2004 .

[49]  C. Hsee,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception,But Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk , 1998 .

[50]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.