Accounting for local scale variability in benthos: implications for future assessments of latitudinal trends in the coastal Ross Sea

This paper is a contribution to the Latitudinal Gradient Project. It describes macro and epifaunal assemblages and habitats at three shallow water locations at the southern end of the western Ross Sea coast, and investigates relationships between faunal composition and environmental characteristics. Many variables (e.g. substrate type, sediment composition, depth, latitude, longitude) contributed to explaining the differences in community composition between locations, with latitude (a likely surrogate for broader scale factors, e.g. ice cover) one of the most important. The percentage explained by environmental characteristics was strongly scale dependent, decreasing with increasing scale of observation. As much as 66% and 75% of the variability in macrofaunal and epifaunal assemblages, respectively, was explained at the smallest scale (i.e. between transects within a location), compared to 9–18% and 11–32%, respectively, at the scale of the entire study. This relationship was also true for species richness and total abundance. This suggests that while small-scale habitat variability will not confound our ability to detect latitudinal gradients in future studies, adequately quantifying the environmental factors important in structuring these communities at larger (latitudinal) spatial scales will be important. Finally, large differences in habitat structure did not translate into large differences in the diversity of fauna, illustrating the difficulty of predicting faunal composition in the Ross Sea based on seafloor topography alone.

[1]  W. Stockton The biology and ecology of the epifaunal scallop Adamussium colbecki on the west side of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica , 1984 .

[2]  M. Gambi,et al.  Composition, abundance and stratification of soft-bottom macrobenthos from selected areas of the Ross Sea shelf (Antarctica) , 1999, Polar Biology.

[3]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Integrating heterogeneity across spatial scales: interactions between Atrina zelandica and benthic macrofauna , 2002 .

[4]  W. Lyons,et al.  Measuring ecosystem response in a rapidly changing environment: the Latitudinal Gradient Project , 2006, Antarctic Science.

[5]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Modifying fishing gear to achieve ecosystem objectives. , 2003 .

[6]  J. Gutt On the direct impact of ice on marine benthic communities, a review , 2001, Polar Biology.

[7]  S. Thrush,et al.  Broad-scale factors influencing the biodiversity of coastal benthic communities of the Ross Sea , 2006 .

[8]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[9]  H. Lenihan,et al.  ANTHROPOGENIC AND NATURAL DISTURBANCES TO MARINE BENTHIC COMMUNITIES IN ANTARCTICA1 , 1995 .

[10]  F. P. Ojeda,et al.  Structure and trophic organization of subtidal fish assemblages on the northern Chilean coast: the effect of habitat complexity , 2001 .

[11]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[12]  J. Gray is deep-sea species diversity really so high? Species diversity of the Norwegian continental shelf , 1994 .

[13]  J. Gage Why are there so many species in deep-sea sediments? , 1996 .

[14]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Scale-up of ecological experiments: Density variation in the mobile bivalve Macomona liliana , 1997 .

[15]  DEBRA P. C. PETERS,et al.  Long-Term and Large-Scale Perspectives on the Relationship between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2003 .

[16]  Andreas Starmans,et al.  Quantification of iceberg impact and benthic recolonisation patterns in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica) , 2001, Polar Biology.

[17]  J. Gutt,et al.  Antarctic shallow-water mega-epibenthos: shaped by circumpolar dispersion or local conditions? , 2004 .

[18]  Gordon A. Robilliard,et al.  Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica , 1974 .

[19]  S. Thrush,et al.  The effect of changing sampling scales on our ability to detect effects of large-scale processes on communities , 1998 .

[20]  M. Chiantore,et al.  Shallow- and deep-water mollusc distribution at Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica) , 2000, Polar Biology.

[21]  M. Chiantore,et al.  Sea urchins, sea stars and brittle stars from Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica) , 2006, Polar Biology.

[22]  A. Jensen,et al.  Effects of increased habitat complexity on fish assemblages associated with large artificial reef units (French Mediterranean coast) , 2002 .

[23]  M. Gambi,et al.  Polychaete populations of the shallow soft bottoms off Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica): distribution, diversity and biomass , 1997, Polar Biology.

[24]  M. Jennings,et al.  Effects of Habitat Complexity on Macroinvertebrate Colonization of Artificial Substrates in North Temperate Lakes , 1998, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  P. Berkman Geochemical signatures of meltwater in mollusc shells from Antarctic coastal areas during the Holocene , 1994 .

[26]  P. Dayton,et al.  Antarctic Soft-Bottom Benthos in Oligotrophic and Eutrophic Environments , 1977, Science.

[27]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Feast and famine: Structuring factors in marine benthic communities , 1987 .

[28]  J. Ellis,et al.  Fishing disturbance and marine biodiversity : the role of habitat structure in simple soft-sediment systems , 2001 .

[29]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[30]  D. Schneider,et al.  Scaling-up from experiments to complex ecological systems: Where to next? , 1997 .

[31]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[32]  J. Barry,et al.  The influence of oceanographic processes on pelagic-benthic coupling in polar regions: A benthic perspective , 1991 .