Involuntary movement during haptics-enabled robotic rehabilitation: Analysis and control design

In this paper, a safety concern arising from pathological tremors in patients interacting with haptics-enabled rehabilitation robots is analyzed and the issue of tremor amplification for assistive/coordinative robotic rehabilitation is investigated. In order to deal with this issue, a control architecture is proposed to dissipate the extra energy of the system and guarantee its stability and safety of the patient. For this purpose, (a) first, a multilayer adaptive filter is proposed to estimate high-frequency components of hand motions (corresponding to involuntary movements); (b) then a resistive force field is generated and applied by the robot to attenuate the tremor; and (c) simultaneously the residual low-frequency voluntary actions are amplified/coordinated to deliver appropriate therapy. Stability analysis and a stabilization scheme are developed to guarantee safe interaction regardless of variations in the patient's dynamics and tremor kinematics. The ultimate goal is to make it possible for patients with pathological tremors to take advantage of non-passive robotic assistive/coordinative therapy. This would not be possible using conventional systems due to the possibility of tremor amplification. Experimental results are presented.

[1]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Developing a Multi-Joint Upper Limb Exoskeleton Robot for Diagnosis, Therapy, and Outcome Evaluation in Neurorehabilitation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Eduardo Rocon,et al.  Pathological tremor management: Modelling, compensatory technology and evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  Motor learning in Parkinson's disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation. , 2009, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[5]  C. Marsden,et al.  Slowness of movement in Parkinson's disease , 1989, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Bimanual coordination deficits with Parkinson's disease: The influence of movement speed and external cueing , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[8]  Win Tun Latt,et al.  Double adaptive bandlimited multiple Fourier linear combiner for real-time estimation/filtering of physiological tremor , 2010, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Global transparency analysis of the Lawrence teleoperator architecture , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Hyunchul Kim,et al.  Kinematic Data Analysis for Post-Stroke Patients Following Bilateral Versus Unilateral Rehabilitation With an Upper Limb Wearable Robotic System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Giovambattista De Sarro,et al.  Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.org Post-stroke Movement Disorders: Clinical Manifestations and Pharma- Cological Management , 2022 .

[13]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Pathological Tremor and Voluntary Motion Modeling and Online Estimation for Active Compensation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Exercise and neuroplasticity in persons living with Parkinson's disease. , 2009, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  B. Schmand,et al.  Motor procedural learning in Parkinson's disease. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Feng Ding,et al.  Performance bounds of forgetting factor least-squares algorithms for time-varying systems with finite measurement data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[18]  Heidar Ali Talebi,et al.  Control of time-delayed telerobotic systems with flexible-link slave manipulators , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Therapeutic Robotics: A Technology Push , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  Peter Xiaoping Liu,et al.  A Multichannel IOS Small Gain Theorem for Systems With Multiple Time-Varying Communication Delays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  Ivan Rektor,et al.  Vascular parkinsonism — an update , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  A. Handley,et al.  Movement disorders after stroke. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[23]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Networked teleoperation with non-passive environment: Application to tele-rehabilitation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Projection-based force reflection algorithms for teleoperated rehabilitation therapy , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  N. Hogan,et al.  A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[26]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Position Tracking for Non-linear Teleoperators with Variable Time Delay , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..