In Vivo Calcium Imaging of Brain Activity in Drosophila by Transgenic Cameleon Expression

Various genetically encoded fluorescent sensors that monitor changes in intracellular calcium concentration have been developed over the last few years. The ability to target these calcium indicators to cells and structures of interest makes them valuable tools for diverse applications and gives them distinct advantages over conventional fluorescent dyes in transgenically tractable organisms. In particular, the cameleon calcium sensors have been used successfully in a number of applications. For example, we use cameleon-2.1 to monitor in vivo brain activity in Drosophila. However, using cameleons to image intracellular calcium concentration changes in vivo is still evolving and is by no means a standard technique. Experimental details and "tricks" for dealing with equipment, techniques, and data evaluation are still restricted to a few laboratories. In this protocol for calcium imaging in Drosophila brain using cameleon-2.1, we provide guidelines to the basic principles of this novel technique in Drosophila neuroscience and, more generally, to the broad field of signal transduction research.

[1]  A. Fiala,et al.  Genetically Expressed Cameleon in Drosophila melanogaster Is Used to Visualize Olfactory Information in Projection Neurons , 2002, Current Biology.

[2]  E. Isacoff,et al.  Genetically encoded optical sensors of neuronal activity and cellular function , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  M. Ohkura,et al.  A high signal-to-noise Ca2+ probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. , 1993, Development.

[5]  Kevin Truong,et al.  FRET-based in vivo Ca2+ imaging by a new calmodulin-GFP fusion molecule , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[6]  A Miyawaki,et al.  Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  C. Leibold,et al.  Transgenic flies expressing the fluorescence calcium sensor cameleon 2.1 under UAS control , 2002, Genesis.

[8]  R. Kelly,et al.  Traffic of Dynamin within Individual DrosophilaSynaptic Boutons Relative to Compartment-Specific Markers , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  J. B. Duffy,et al.  GAL4 system in drosophila: A fly geneticist's swiss army knife , 2002, Genesis.

[10]  R. Tsien,et al.  Circular permutation and receptor insertion within green fluorescent proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Stocker,et al.  Neuroblast ablation in Drosophila P[GAL4] lines reveals origins of olfactory interneurons. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[12]  A. Persechini,et al.  Detection in Living Cells of Ca2+-dependent Changes in the Fluorescence Emission of an Indicator Composed of Two Green Fluorescent Protein Variants Linked by a Calmodulin-binding Sequence , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  R. Tsien,et al.  Reducing the Environmental Sensitivity of Yellow Fluorescent Protein , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  D. Reiff,et al.  Differential Regulation of Active Zone Density during Long-Term Strengthening of Drosophila Neuromuscular Junctions , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Wong,et al.  Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Reveals an Odor-Evoked Map of Activity in the Fly Brain , 2003, Cell.

[16]  R. Tsien,et al.  Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Ronald L. Davis,et al.  Detection of Calcium Transients in DrosophilaMushroom Body Neurons with Camgaroo Reporters , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.