A study on user preference of high dynamic range over low dynamic range video

The increased interest in high dynamic range (HDR) video over existing low dynamic range (LDR) video during the past decade or so was primarily due to its inherent capability to capture, store and display the full range of real-world lighting visible to the human eye with increased precision. This has led to an inherent assumption that HDR video would be preferable by the end-user over LDR video due to the more immersive and realistic visual experience provided by HDR. This assumption has led to a considerable body of research into efficient capture, processing, storage and display of HDR video. Although this is beneficial for scientific research and industrial purposes, very little research has been conducted to test the veracity of this assumption. In this paper, we conduct two subjective studies by means of a ranking and a rating-based experiment where 60 participants in total, 30 in each experiment, were tasked to rank and rate several reference HDR video scenes along with three mapped LDR versions of each scene on an HDR display, in order of their viewing preference. Results suggest that given the option, end-users prefer the HDR representation of the scene over its LDR counterpart.

[1]  D. Freedman,et al.  On the histogram as a density estimator:L2 theory , 1981 .

[2]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  iCAM06: A refined image appearance model for HDR image rendering , 2007, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[3]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Development and Testing of a Color Space (IPT) with Improved Hue Uniformity , 1998, CIC.

[4]  Alan Chalmers,et al.  Tone Mapping Operators on Small Screen Devices: An Evaluation Study , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  Kurt Debattista,et al.  Advanced High Dynamic Range Imaging: Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[6]  Michael Wimmer,et al.  Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes , 2008, Comput. Graph..

[7]  Alan Chalmers,et al.  Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display , 2005, ACM Trans. Graph..

[8]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images , 2002 .

[9]  Robert Wanat,et al.  Evaluation of Tone Mapping Operators for HDR-Video , 2013, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[10]  Patrick J. Wolfe,et al.  Optimal exposure control for high dynamic range imaging , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Color Appearance Models: Fairchild/Color Appearance Models , 2013 .

[12]  Michael H. Brill,et al.  Color appearance models , 1998 .

[13]  Changjun Li,et al.  The CIECAM02 Color Appearance Model , 2002, CIC.

[14]  Elmedin Selmanovic,et al.  Optimal exposure compression for high dynamic range content , 2015, The Visual Computer.

[15]  Kurt Debattista,et al.  Evaluation of Tone‐Mapping Operators for HDR Video Under Different Ambient Luminance Levels , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Single exposure vs tone mapped High Dynamic Range images: A study based on quality of experience , 2014, 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[17]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Display adaptive tone mapping , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[18]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators , 2003, SIGGRAPH '03.

[19]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Christophe Schlick,et al.  Quantization Techniques for Visualization of High Dynamic Range Pictures , 1995 .

[21]  Mahdi Nezamabadi,et al.  Color Appearance Models , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[22]  Hiroshi Yamaguchi,et al.  Evaluating HDR rendering algorithms , 2007, TAP.

[23]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Do HDR displays support LDR content?: a psychophysical evaluation , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..