Initial performance evaluation of a high resolution Albira small animal positron emission tomography scanner with monolithic crystals and depth-of-interaction encoding from a user's perspective

The user evaluation of the Albira small animal positron emission tomography scanner is presented. The system has a 80 mm × 40 mm field of view. In the center of the field of view, it has 2.49% sensitivity, with 33% solid angle coverage, and 0.88% sensitivity for a mouse phantom. The maximum of noise equivalent counts is 14.6 kcps at 6.0 MBq for a mouse phantom. The scanner employs an innovative crystal design of eight 40(50) × 40(50) × 9.8 mm3 LYSO tapered monolithic crystals forming detector modules read by position-sensitive photomultipliers. This design allows for easy depth-of-interaction readout. The system saturates at 6.7 MBq for the mouse phantom. As an example of the application of the Albira system, some preliminary results from a study of ischemic stroke on animal models with 18-FDG co-registered with MRI images are shown.

[1]  R D Badawi,et al.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Depth of interaction detection with enhanced position-sensitive proportional resistor network , 2005 .

[3]  O. Hurtado,et al.  Inhibition of glutamate release by delaying ATP fall accounts for neuroprotective effects of antioxidants in experimental stroke , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Marc C. Huisman,et al.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Peter Bruyndonckx,et al.  Monolithic scintillator PET detectors with intrinsic depth-of-interaction correction , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  T. Ling,et al.  Performance Comparisons of Continuous Miniature Crystal Element (cMiCE) Detectors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  T. Spinks,et al.  Correction for scatter in 3D brain PET using a dual energy window method. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Performance Measurement of the microPET Focus 120 Scanner , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  B. Siesjö,et al.  Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra. , 1981, Stroke.