Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North

The impact of the scientific output produced by different nations in different fields varies extensively. In this article, we apply bibliometric and econometric analysis to study how citation impact varies across countries. This paper differs from previous research in that a cross-section model is put forward to account for such variation. A special focus is given to the Global South, as countries in this group have been converging with the Global North recently. We find that previous citation impact, level of international collaboration and total publications in a specific scientific field are important determinants of citation impact among all nations. However, specialization in particular scientific fields seems significantly more important in the Global South than in the Global North. These findings imply that most lower- and middle-income countries would better concentrate their resources in generating higher critical masses in specific fields, in addition to pursuing long-lasting international collaboration partnerships, as these actions may lead to higher impact research.

[1]  R. Cowan,et al.  Global Excellence at the Expense of Local Diffusion, or a Bridge between Two Worlds? Research in Science and Technology in the Developing World , 2012 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque,et al.  Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries , 2003 .

[5]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science , 2014, Scientometrics.

[6]  Yasunori Baba,et al.  Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: The case of life sciences in Japan , 2015 .

[7]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data? , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison , 2012, Scientometrics.

[10]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[11]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[12]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  A Review of Stata Commands for Fixed-Effects Estimation in Normal Linear Models , 2012 .

[13]  Hanna-Mari Puuska,et al.  International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines , 2013, Scientometrics.

[14]  Howard D. White,et al.  Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities , 2004, Scientometrics.

[15]  Robert J.W. Tijssen,et al.  Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public-private collaboration , 2012 .

[16]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Percentile Rank and Author Superiority Indexes for Evaluating Individual Journal Articles and the Author’s Overall Citation Performance , 2009 .

[17]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric study of highly cited European physics papers in the 80s , 1995 .

[18]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Under-Reporting Research Relevant to Local Needs in The Global South. Database Biases in the Representation of Knowledge on Rice , 2020, ISSI.

[19]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[20]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[21]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Daniele Fanelli,et al.  Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.

[23]  P. Zhou,et al.  The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 2006, 83-104. , 2006, 0911.3421.

[24]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  Technological Change and Industrialization in the Asian Newly Industrializing Economies: Achievements and Challenges , 2001 .

[25]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  The impact of network embeddedness on research output , 2013 .

[26]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[27]  Manuel Mira Godinho,et al.  The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis , 2014, Scientometrics.

[28]  S. Baldi.  Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .

[29]  G. Gilbert.  Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[30]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[31]  K. Knorr-Cetina.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1985 .

[32]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Research and the practice of publication in industries , 1996 .

[34]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: science in the tip of Africa , 2010, Scientometrics.

[35]  A. Raan.  The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments , 2003 .

[36]  Rosely de Andrade Vargas,et al.  The role of National journals on the rise in Brazilian Agricultural Science Publications in Web of Science , 2014, J. Sci. Res..

[37]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[38]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Eustache Mêgnigbêto.  International collaboration in scientific publishing: the case of West Africa (2001–2010) , 2013, Scientometrics.

[40]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation and Catching-Up , 2006 .

[41]  Cody J. Weinberger,et al.  The Scientific Impact of Nations: Journal Placement and Citation Performance , 2014, PloS one.

[42]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Is concentration of university research associated with better research performance? , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[43]  Jonathan Adams.  Collaborations: The fourth age of research , 2013, Nature.

[44]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[45]  Tony Dale,et al.  Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[46]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[47]  Eladio Montoya Melgar,et al.  A bibliometric study , 2012 .

[48]  R. May.  The Scientific Wealth of Nations , 1997, Science.

[49]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[50]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry , 2010 .

[51]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Evaluation of Research Performance and Scientometric Indicators in China , 2004 .

[52]  Zameer Shah,et al.  Measuring science , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[53]  Emanuela Riviera.  Testing the strength of the normative approach in citation theory through relational bibliometrics: The case of italian sociology , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[55]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[56]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities , 2009 .

[57]  P. Fan,et al.  What is the evidence on the impact of research on international development , 2014 .

[58]  R. Nelson,et al.  The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch-up , 2005 .

[59]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[60]  José Goldemberg,et al.  What Is the Role of Science in Developing Countries? , 1998, Science.

[61]  Lili Wang,et al.  The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives , 2015, Scientometrics.

[62]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[63]  Yves Gingras,et al.  What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model , 2000 .

[64]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[65]  Eduardo da Motta.  SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS IN LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES , 2004 .

[66]  Ne Groce,et al.  What type of data is are needed on disability to inform DFID policy and practice and to add to the post-2015 agenda? Written Evidence to Inquiry on Disability and International Development. , 2014 .

[67]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[68]  Félix Moya-Anegón,et al.  Worldwide Topology of the Scientific Subject Profile: A Macro Approach in the Country Level , 2013, PloS one.

[69]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities , 2016 .

[70]  J. Koricheva,et al.  What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  Francisco Collazo-Reyes.  Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each country , 2013, Scientometrics.

[72]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends , 2013, PloS one.

[73]  Brent R. Moulton.  An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Unit , 1990 .

[74]  Slavo Radosevic,et al.  Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions , 2014, Scientometrics.

[75]  P. Lawrence.  The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.

[76]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[77]  A. F. J. Van Raan,et al.  On determinants of citation scores: a case study in chemical engineering , 1994 .

[78]  R. Nelson,et al.  Public research institutions and economic catch-up , 2007 .