Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes

One of the main functions that visual attention serves in perception and action is feature binding; that is, integrating all information that belongs to an object. The outcome of this integration has been called “object file”, a hypothetical memory structure coding episodic combinations of stimulus features. Action-oriented approaches to attention, however, suggest that such a purely perceptual or perceptually derived structure may be incomplete: If attention subserves action control, object files may include action-related information as well. That is, featurebinding may notbe restrictedto stimulus features butalso includefeatures of the responses made to the respective stimulus. In three experiments, subjects performed simple, already prepared left- or right-key responses (R1) to the mere presence of “Go” signals (S1) that varied randomly in form, colour and location. Shortly after the prepared response, a binary choice reaction (R2) to the form or colour of a second stimulus (S2) was made. The results ...

[1]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[5]  R. Weale Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[6]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[7]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[8]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  O. Neumann Visual Attention and Action , 1990 .

[11]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[12]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[15]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[17]  M D Anes,et al.  Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioural Goals Determine Inhibitory Mechanisms of Selective Attention , 1994 .

[19]  A. Treisman Visual Attention and the Perception of Features and Objects , 1994 .

[20]  J. Henderson,et al.  Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  What Is Learned During Automatization? The Role of Attention in Constructing an Instance , 1994 .

[22]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[23]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Determinants of negative priming. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  W. Schneider VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[25]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  B. Hommel,et al.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility: Editors' introduction , 1997 .

[29]  de Ritske Jong,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .