Retrospective observation on contribution and limitations of screening for breast cancer with mammography in Korea: detection rate of breast cancer and incidence rate of interval cancer of the breast

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the benefits and limitations of screening for breast cancer using mammography.MethodsDescriptive design with follow-up was used in the study. Data from breast cancer screening and health insurance claim data were used. The study population consisted of all participants in breast cancer screening from 2009 to 2014. Crude detection rate, positive predictive value and sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening and, incidence rate of interval cancer of the breast were calculated.ResultsThe crude detection rate of breast cancer screening per 100,000 participants increased from 126.3 in 2009 to 182.1 in 2014. The positive predictive value of breast cancer screening per 100,000 positives increased from 741.2 in 2009 to 1,367.9 in 2014. The incidence rate of interval cancer of the breast per 100,000 negatives increased from 51.7 in 2009 to 76.3 in 2014. The sensitivities of screening for breast cancer were 74.6% in 2009 and 75.1% in 2014 and the specificities were 83.1% in 2009 and 85.7% in 2014.ConclusionsTo increase the detection rate of breast cancer by breast cancer screening using mammography, the participation rate should be higher and an environment where accurate mammography and reading can be performed and reinforcement of quality control are required. To reduce the incidence rate of interval cancer of the breast, it will be necessary to educate women after their 20s to perform self-examination of the breast once a month regardless of participation in screening for breast cancer.

[1]  L. J. Burhenne,et al.  Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J. Lim Interval Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[3]  K. Choi,et al.  Predictors of Intention to Undergo Mammography among Underutilizers , 2009 .

[4]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. Giles,et al.  The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[7]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[8]  H. Welch,et al.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[9]  M. Tozaki,et al.  The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast cancer , 2014, Breast Cancer.

[10]  Lawyer,et al.  The Japanese , 2017 .

[11]  Alain Arneodo,et al.  Comparative Multifractal Analysis of Dynamic Infrared Thermograms and X-Ray Mammograms Enlightens Changes in the Environment of Malignant Tumors , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[12]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms , 2011, Cancer science.

[13]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography. , 2014, Radiology.

[14]  C. Land,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk from Different Mammography Screening Practices , 2010, Radiation research.

[15]  H. Kim,et al.  Analysis of prior mammography with negative result in women with interval breast cancer , 2016, Breast Cancer.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[18]  Likelihood of early detection of breast cancer in relation to false-positive risk in life-time mammographic screening: population-based cohort study. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  E. Burnside,et al.  Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening. , 2010, Imaging in medicine.

[20]  S. Sunwoo,et al.  The Korean guideline for breast cancer screening , 2015 .

[21]  M. Vaska,et al.  Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  Yoon Jung Choi,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density Evaluation in Korean Women Using Fully Automated Volumetric Assessment , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.

[23]  Talya Salz,et al.  Meta‐analyses of the effect of false‐positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes , 2010, Psycho-oncology.

[24]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.

[25]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Short-Term Outcomes of Screening Mammography Using Computer-Aided Detection , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  C. Nam,et al.  Distribution of dense breasts using screening mammography in Korean women: a retrospective observational study , 2014, Epidemiology and health.

[28]  Yeonju Kim,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening in Korean Women: Report of the National Cancer Screening Program in 2008 , 2010 .

[29]  You Me Kim,et al.  The Efficacy of Mammography Boot Camp to Improve the Performance of Radiologists , 2014, Korean journal of radiology.