Nexus thinking in current EU policies – The interdependencies among food, energy and water resources

Abstract In recent years there has been a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food-energy-water- (FEW-) nexus. Although the concept has played a significant role in much of the political sustainability debate since its emergence in 2011, it is increasingly criticized for its conceptual character and lack of practicability. To address the question of the concept’s application in the political practice of the European Union, an analysis of currently existing EU policies has been conducted with specific focus on implemented nexus thinking. To limit the scope of the study, policy documents were chosen from the major political frameworks within the directly nexus-relevant policy sectors agricultural, energy and water policy, most notably – but not exclusively – the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), the EU Energy Strategy, and the Water Framework Directive (WFD), as well as documents which address the integration among those. The study included a total of 50 policy documents. An inductive research approach was chosen to derive a FEW nexus specific coding system for the computer-assisted, semi-quantitative and qualitative analysis of the documents. The results reflect the fact that, in the past, policy design has mostly been framed within sectoral mandates, e.g., for water, agriculture or energy. Cross-sectoral effects especially among all three nexus resources have only recently been accounted for and predominantly exist in the form of non-formalized statements of intent. The establishment of cross-sectoral thinking is most advanced between the sectors of agricultural and water policy, mainly driven by their respective and historically grown roles within the nexus system.

[1]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Notes toward a Theory of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Glyn Davis,et al.  From hierarchy to contracts and back again: reforming the Australian public service , 2000 .

[3]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Cross-sectoral integration in the Sustainable Development Goals: a nexus approach , 2014 .

[4]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review , 2010 .

[5]  U. Flick,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2013 .

[6]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts , 2013, Political Analysis.

[7]  A. Neef,et al.  Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods , 2015 .

[8]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[9]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Using software in qualitative analysis , 2013 .

[10]  D. Wichelns The water-energy-food nexus: Is the increasing attention warranted, from either a research or policy perspective? , 2017 .

[11]  David Benson,et al.  The water–energy–food (WEF) security nexus: the policy perspective of Bangladesh , 2015 .

[12]  E. Sørensen Metagovernance , 2006 .

[13]  Pieter van der Zaag,et al.  Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping With Complexity and Uncertainty , 2008 .

[14]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance , 1997 .

[15]  Paul R. Hunter,et al.  European policy responses to climate change: progress on mainstreaming emissions reduction and adaptation , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[16]  M. V. Vliet,et al.  Water constraints on European power supply under climate change: impacts on electricity prices , 2013 .

[17]  Irene Monasterolo,et al.  Understanding barriers to decision making in the UK energy-food-water nexus: The added value of interdisciplinary approaches , 2016 .

[18]  A. Gain,et al.  Water Governance in a Comparative Perspective: From IWRM to a 'Nexus' Approach? , 2015 .

[19]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Policy note: Lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda , 2017 .

[20]  D. Waughray,et al.  Water security : the water-food-energy-climate nexus : the World Economic Forum water initiative , 2011 .

[21]  Eivind Hovden,et al.  Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework , 2003 .

[22]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance , 2007 .

[23]  M. Kurian The water-energy-food nexus: Trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development , 2017 .

[24]  Rose Cairns,et al.  Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates , 2016 .

[25]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Innovation in Environmental Policy?: Integrating the Environment for Sustainability , 2009 .

[27]  Louis Meuleman,et al.  Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations , 2008 .

[28]  Foro Económico Mundial Global Risks 2013 , 2013 .

[29]  I. Tömmel EU Governance of Governance: Political Steering in a Non-Hierarchical Multilevel System , 2016, Journal of Contemporary European Research.