Coarse-grained Bubble Razor to exploit the potential of two-phase transparent latch designs

Timing margin to cover process variation is one of the most critical factors that limit the amount of supply voltage reduction thereby power consumption. To remove too conservative timing margin, Bubble Razor was introduced to dynamically detect and correct errors in two-phase transparent latch designs [13]. However, it does not fully exploit the potential of two-phase transparent latch design, e.g. time borrowing. Thus, especially at low supply voltage where the effect of process variation becomes significant, the existing Bubble Razor can suffer from significant overhead in performance and power consumption due to too frequent occurrence of bubble generations. We present a design methodology for coarse-grained Bubble Razor which exploits the time-borrowing characteristic of two-phase transparent latch design. By selectively inserting error checkpoints, i.e., shadow latches and error management logic, in the circuit, time borrowing can be applied between error checkpoints thereby avoiding bubbles which could occur in the existing Bubble Razor design with a checkpoint at every latch on the critical path. We present a methodology to choose the grain size (the number of stages between error checkpoints) based on 3-sigma delay distribution. We also verify the benefits of coarse-grained Bubble Razor with a real microprocessor, Core-A design [15] using 20nm Predictive Technology Model (PTM) [16]. The proposed methodology offers 62% improvement in performance (MIPS) and 49% less energy consumption (per instruction) at 0.6V operation (zero frequency margin) over the original Bubble Razor scheme. In addition, it gives 25% area reduction in core design.

[1]  Soraya Ghiasi,et al.  A Distributed Critical-Path Timing Monitor for a 65nm High-Performance Microprocessor , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers.

[2]  J. Tschanz,et al.  Tunable replica circuits and adaptive voltage-frequency techniques for dynamic voltage, temperature, and aging variation tolerance , 2009, 2009 Symposium on VLSI Circuits.

[3]  Takayasu Sakurai,et al.  13% Power reduction in 16b integer unit in 40nm CMOS by adaptive power supply voltage control with parity-based error prediction and detection (PEPD) and fully integrated digital LDO , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[4]  David Blaauw,et al.  Razor II: In Situ Error Detection and Correction for PVT and SER Tolerance , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.

[5]  Trevor Mudge,et al.  Razor: a low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation , 2003, Proceedings. 36th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2003. MICRO-36..

[6]  Jae-Joon Kim,et al.  A pipeline architecture with 1-cycle timing error correction for low voltage operations , 2013, International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED).

[7]  Sanjay Pant,et al.  A self-tuning DVS processor using delay-error detection and correction , 2005, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[8]  Takahiro Seki,et al.  Dynamic voltage and frequency management for a low-power embedded microprocessor , 2005, 2004 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37519).

[9]  K.A. Bowman,et al.  Energy-Efficient and Metastability-Immune Resilient Circuits for Dynamic Variation Tolerance , 2009, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[10]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  A dynamic voltage scaled microprocessor system , 2000, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[11]  Mark Anders,et al.  Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design — Opportunities and challenges , 2012, DAC Design Automation Conference 2012.

[12]  David M. Bull,et al.  RazorII: In Situ Error Detection and Correction for PVT and SER Tolerance , 2009, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[13]  Bishop Brock,et al.  A 32-bit PowerPC system-on-a-chip with support for dynamic voltage scaling and dynamic frequency scaling , 2002, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[14]  David Blaauw,et al.  Bubble Razor: Eliminating Timing Margins in an ARM Cortex-M3 Processor in 45 nm CMOS Using Architecturally Independent Error Detection and Correction , 2013, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[15]  Dragan Maksimovic,et al.  Closed-loop adaptive voltage scaling controller for standard-cell ASICs , 2002, ISLPED '02.