Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: measuring children's change in strategy use with a series completion task.

AIMS This study sought to explore the use of a novel approach that incorporates dynamic testing and tangible electronics in the assessment of children's learning potential and strategy use. SAMPLE A total of 77 children with a mean age 8.9 years participated in the study; half of them were dynamically tested using graduate prompt techniques; the others served as a control group. METHOD Children in the experimental group received a series of inputs consisting of a pre-test, two training sessions, and a post-test all involving a number of series completion tasks; the controls received only pre- and post-tests. All test sessions were undertaken individually using a specially designed programme incorporating an electronic console and tangible materials equipped internally with sensors. RESULTS As a consequence of training, children significantly outperformed controls on a number of series completion tasks. Significant individual differences were noted in terms of the children's response to assistance. The study's hypothesis that dynamic testing would increase analytical, and reduce trial-and-error, behaviour was supported. While a significant proportion of the children employed strategies that had earlier been identified as optimal, a sizeable minority demonstrated rather more idiosyncratic approaches. CONCLUSIONS Findings from the study demonstrate the potential value of electronic dynamic testing using graduated prompts. However, a number of further refinements to improve the procedure are suggested.

[1]  H A SIMON,et al.  HUMAN ACQUISITION OF CONCEPTS FOR SEQUENTIAL PATTERNS. , 1963, Psychological review.

[2]  Annual review: Neuroscience and education , 2004 .

[3]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Decision Tree Approach to Conducting Dynamic Assessment in a Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environment , 2008, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (wmute 2008).

[4]  J. Elliott Dynamic Assessment in Educational Settings: Realising potential , 2003 .

[5]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Educational Implications of Analogy: A View from Case-Based Reasoning , 1997 .

[6]  Laura A. Barquero,et al.  Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process. , 2010, Journal of educational psychology.

[7]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Dynamic Assessment as Responsiveness to Intervention; a Scripted Protocol to Identify Young At-Risk Readers , 2007 .

[8]  Ivan Yuen,et al.  Understanding speech production using electropalatography , 2007 .

[9]  R. Fabio Dynamic Assessment of Intelligence Is a Better Reply to Adaptive Behavior and Cognitive Plasticity , 2005, The Journal of general psychology.

[10]  T. Bosma,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Diagnostic Assessment and Classroom Practice , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[11]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristic and analytic processing: age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  K. Wiedl,et al.  Dynamic Testing: A Comprehensive Model and Current Fields of Application , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Empirical tests of a theory of human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns , 1973 .

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  A cube to learn: a tangible user interface for the design of a learning appliance , 2005, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Unities in inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[16]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings , 2007 .

[17]  Elena L Grigorenko,et al.  Dynamic Assessment and Response to Intervention , 2009, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual variability in the process of change in the use of analogical strategies to solve geometric tasks in children: A microgenetic analysis , 2008 .

[19]  H. Schöttke,et al.  On the Concordance of Three Reliable Change Indexes: An Analysis Applying the Dynamic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[20]  G. Phye,et al.  Inductive Reasoning: A Training Approach , 2008 .

[21]  Jettie Hoonhout,et al.  TagTiles: optimal challenge in educational electronics , 2007, TEI.

[22]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Learning During Dynamic Testing: Variability in Strategy Use by Indigenous and Ethnic Minority Children , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[23]  Allison Druin,et al.  Tangible user interfaces for children , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance , 1985 .

[25]  Małgorzata Kossowska,et al.  Do it your own way: Cognitive strategies, intelligence, and personality , 1994 .

[26]  M. G. Hessels Estimation of the Predictive Validity of the HART by Means of a Dynamic Test of Geography , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[27]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Dynamic Assessment , 2008 .

[28]  U. Goswami Neuroscience and education. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[29]  J. Campione,et al.  Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development. , 1986, Child development.

[30]  D. Fuchs,et al.  What We Need to Know about Responsiveness to Intervention (and Shouldn't Be Afraid to Ask). , 2007 .

[31]  Linda Jarvin,et al.  Making Instruction and Assessment Responsive to Diverse Students’ Progress: Group-Administered Dynamic Assessment in Teaching Mathematics , 2011, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[33]  U. Goswami,et al.  Analogical reasoning and cognitive development. , 1996, Advances in child development and behavior.

[34]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Dynamic testing in indigenous and ethnic minority children , 2009 .

[35]  Nira Granott,et al.  Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives , 2005 .

[36]  R. Siegler,et al.  What leads children to adopt new strategies? A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of class inclusion. , 2006, Child development.