Parabolic flight reveals independent binocular control of otolith-induced eye torsion.

To examine otolith-governed ocular torsion in hyper- and hypogravity, eight subjects, including two astronauts, underwent parabolic flight while seated upright with head fixed. A mask fitted with two video cameras provided synchronized images of both eyes at a rate of 25/sec during 15 parabolas, the individual parabolas separated by a few minutes of level 1 G flight. Three main findings emerged: 1) After the first parabola, most subjects showed differential torsional offset of the two eyes in the 1 G portions between parabolas, compared to the conjugate baseline position of the eyes prior to the first parabola. 2) Changes in binocular torsion in the 0 G and 1.8 G portions of parabolic flight revealed in most subjects systematic reversal of direction. The reversal was consistent within, but not across subjects. 3) Disconjugacy defined as the moment-to-moment difference in the movements of the two eyes, and evaluated without the contribution of the differential offset, found two subjects with relatively high disconjugacy scores, and the remaining six with low scores. On the basis of prior studies (9, 20), we would predict the first two would be subject to SMS, the remainder not. The two astronauts, who did not have SMS on their space missions, fell into the low scoring group. We propose that the disconjugacies may be due to intrinsic asymmetries in the otolith receptors on the two sides of the head, which appear to be independently linked to the extraocular muscles of the two eyes, a phenomenon masked in normal 1 G states by adaptation. The apparently independent control of the two sides cannot be detected by the simpler and more common monocular studies.

[1]  S G Diamond,et al.  Further evidence to support disconjugate eye torsion as a predictor of space motion sickness. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The influence of otoliths and somatic graviceptors on angular velocity estimation. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  S G Diamond,et al.  Prediction of space motion sickness susceptibility by disconjugate eye torsion in parabolic flight. , 1991, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  I. Curthoys,et al.  Human Ocular Counterrolling During Roll‐Tilt and Centrifugation , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R D Tomlinson,et al.  Eye position signals in the vestibular nuclei: consequences for models of integrator function. , 1994, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[6]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  S G Diamond,et al.  The effect of space missions on gravity-responsive torsional eye movements. , 1998, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[8]  S G Diamond,et al.  Binocular Counterrolling during Sustained Body Tilt in Normal Humans and in a Patient with Unilateral Vestibular Nerve Section , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic versus Vestibular Gravity Reception in Man , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  W. Abend,et al.  Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L. Young,et al.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  T Vilis,et al.  A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  B Cohen,et al.  Labyrinthine and extra-labyrinthine effects on ocular counter-rolling. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  M. S. Estes,et al.  Vestibular influences on ocular accommodation in cats. , 1973, International journal of equilibrium research.