The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions

English resultative expressions have been a major focus of research on the syntax-semantics interface. We argue in this article that a family of related constructions is required to account for their distribution. We demonstrate that a number of generalizations follow from the semantics of the constructions we posit: the syntactic argument structure of the sentence is predicted by general principles of argument linking; and the aspectual structure of the sentence is determined by the aspectual structure of the constructional subevent, which is in turn predictable from general principles correlating event structure with change, extension, motion, and paths. Finally, the semantics and syntax of resultatives explain the possibilities for temporal relations between the two subevents. While these generalizations clearly exist, there is also a great deal of idiosyncrasy involved in resultatives. Many idiosyncratic instances and small subclasses of the construction must be learned and stored individually. This account serves to justify aspects of what we share in our overall vision of grammar, whatwe might call the CONSTRUCTIONAL view. To the extent that our treatment of the resultative can be stated only within the constructional view, it serves as evidence for this view as a whole.

[1]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[2]  Frederik Theodoor Visser,et al.  An Historical Syntax of the English Language , 2002 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[4]  Roderick A. Jacobs,et al.  Readings in English transformational grammar , 1970 .

[5]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  Three Reasons for Not Deriving ‘Kill’ from ‘Cause to Die’ in Japanese , 1972 .

[6]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Conversational Implicature and the Lexicon , 1978 .

[8]  G. Gazdar,et al.  Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics: Peter Cole, ed., New York: Academic Press. 1978. pp. xii + 340. , 1980 .

[9]  Lori S. Levin,et al.  Papers in lexical-functional grammar , 1983 .

[10]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[11]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[12]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[13]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[14]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[15]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[16]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[17]  Riitta Valimaa-Blum,et al.  Finnish Word Order as a Set of Syntactic Constructions , 1988 .

[18]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[19]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[20]  Jon Aske,et al.  Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look , 1989 .

[21]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[22]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar volume I. Theoretical prerequisites: By Ronald W. Langacker. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987, xii + 516pp , 1989 .

[23]  Van Valin,et al.  Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .

[24]  Richard Hudson,et al.  English word grammar , 1995 .

[25]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration , 1991, Cognition.

[26]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[27]  A. Goldberg The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction , 1992 .

[28]  J. Randall,et al.  The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives , 1992 .

[29]  R. Langacker Reference-point constructions , 1993 .

[30]  Edwin Williams,et al.  Remarks on lexical knowledge , 1994 .

[31]  Laura A. Michaelis A case of constructional polysemy in Latin , 1994 .

[32]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[33]  B. Levin Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[34]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[35]  Walter Breu,et al.  Interactions Between Lexical, Temporal and Aspectual Meanings , 1994 .

[36]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  Dealing Out Meaning: Fundamentals of Syntactic Constructions , 1994 .

[37]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  On the Proper Treatment of Tense , 1995 .

[38]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  TOWARD A CONSTRUCTION-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE FUNCTION : THE CASE OF NOMINAL EXTRAPOSITION , 1996 .

[39]  R. Jackendoff The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[40]  I. Sag English relative clause constructions , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[41]  Ray Jackendoff TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[42]  P. Culicover Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination , 1997 .

[43]  R. Washio,et al.  Resultatives, Compositionality and Language Variation , 1997 .

[44]  Cornelia Maria Verspoor,et al.  Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics , 1997 .

[45]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[46]  Bhuvaneswari Narasimhan,et al.  The encoding of complex events in Hindi and English , 1998 .

[47]  Ken-ichi Takami Unaccusativity and the Resultative Constructions in English and Japanese , 1998 .

[48]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[49]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The emergence of language. , 1999 .

[50]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[51]  Johanna Barddal Case in Icelandic. A Construction Grammar Approach , 1999 .

[52]  M. Tomasello,et al.  How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions. , 1999 .

[53]  Studies in English Linguistics: A Festschrift for Akira Ota on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday , 1999 .

[54]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring , 2000 .

[55]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Typology and Process in Concept Structuring , 2000 .

[56]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[57]  Stephen Wechsler,et al.  An Analysis of English Resultatives Under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity , 2000 .

[58]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted:the role of information structure in argument distribution , 2001 .

[59]  W. Bruce Croft Radical Construction Grammar , 2001 .

[60]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .

[61]  Hans C. Boas,et al.  Resultative constructions in English and German , 2001 .

[62]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives , 2001 .

[63]  Ida Toivonen,et al.  The directed motion construction in Swedish , 2002, Journal of Linguistics.

[64]  Paul Kay,et al.  English Subjectless Tagged Sentences , 2002 .

[65]  Arie Verhagen,et al.  From parts to wholes and back again , 2002 .

[66]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[67]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[68]  G. Booij Constructional Idioms, Morphology, and the Dutch Lexicon , 2002, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[69]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[70]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[71]  Ka Cormier,et al.  Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , 2004 .

[72]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[73]  Susan Foster-Cohen,et al.  CONSTRUCTING A LANGUAGE: A USAGE-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[74]  B. Joseph,et al.  ONE RULE OR MANY ? SANSKRIT REDUPLICATION AS FRAGMENTED AFFIXATION , 2005 .

[75]  A. Goldberg Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors , 2005 .

[76]  Nomi Erteschik-Shir,et al.  The Syntax of Aspect , 2005 .

[77]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[78]  Mirjam Fried,et al.  A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech , 2005 .

[79]  Anna Herwig,et al.  Lexicon and Grammar , 2005 .

[80]  Resultatives at the Crossroads between the Lexicon and Syntax , 2006 .