Lessons from Medicare+Choice for Medicare reform.

C urrent discussions of the future of Medicare include proposals to increase the enrollment of beneficiaries in private health insurance plans. These proposals would provide incentives for beneficiaries to join private plans, rely on more loosely structured health plans such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs), change the way health plans are paid, and in some cases create competition between private plans and traditional fee-for-service Medicare. Today’s proposals follow upon Medicare’s long history with private health plans.The most significant effort to expand the enrollment in private plans occurred with the passage of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), which created the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program.The objectives of M+C included expanding the types of plans available to Medicare beneficiaries, increasing payments to plans in low-cost areas, and fostering competition among private plans. M+C has not met proponents’ expectations.Tied to the low increases in Medicare’s fee-for-service program and buffeted by provider pushback and an inability to control costs of care, HMOs have left the M+C program in large numbers. Although many private M+C plans perform well compared with fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare on selected preventive health measures, on other measures—including access to care, stability of providers, simplicity of benefit structure, and costs to the Medicare program—the history of M+C is less positive. Turbulence in the program and beneficiary dissatisfaction have contributed to a decline in M+C enrollment, from 16 percent in 1998 to 11 percent in 2003 (Figure 1). It had originally been projected that enrollment would reach 34 percent by 2005. The six-year history of M+C provides seven lessons to help inform the policy debate on Medicare reform proposals. The Commonwealth Fund is a private foundation supporting independent research on health and social issues.The views presented here are those of the authors and should not be attributed to The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff.

[1]  M. Gold,et al.  Medicare+Choice Plans Continue to Shift More Costs to Enrollees. The Commonwealth Fund , 2003 .

[2]  Cristina Boccuti,et al.  Comparing Medicare and private insurers: growth rates in spending over three decades. , 2003, Health affairs.

[3]  J. Grossman,et al.  Medicare contracting risk/Medicare risk contracting: a life-cycle view from twelve markets. , 2003, Health services research.

[4]  M. Gold,et al.  Average out-of-pocket health care costs for Medicare+Choice enrollees increase substantially in 2002. , 2002, Issue brief.

[5]  K. Davis,et al.  Medicare versus private insurance: rhetoric and reality. , 2002, Health affairs.

[6]  B. Biles,et al.  Medicare+Choice After Five Years: Lessons for Medicare's Future , 2002 .

[7]  B. Biles,et al.  Geographic Inequity in Medicare+Choice Benefits: Findings from Seven Communities , 2002 .

[8]  M. Gold,et al.  The Role of National Firms in Medicare+Choice , 2002 .

[9]  M. Gold,et al.  Medicare+Choice 1999-2001: An Analysis of Managed Care Plan Withdrawals and Trends in Benefits and Premiums , 2002 .

[10]  R. Berenson Medicare+Choice: doubling or disappearing? , 2001, Health affairs.

[11]  G. Dallek Restoring Choice to Medicare+Choice: The Importance of Standardizing Health Plan Benefit Packages , 2001 .

[12]  B. Biles,et al.  National and Local Factors Driving Health Plan Withdrawals from Medicare+Choice , 2001 .

[13]  T. Buchmueller The health plan choices of retirees under managed competition. , 2000, Health services research.

[14]  L. Alecxih,et al.  Medigap regulation: lessons for health care reform. , 1995, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[15]  M. Merlis The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Program Design, Recent Performance, and Implications for Medicare Reform , 2003 .

[16]  T. Rice,et al.  The impact of policy standardization on the Medigap market. , 1997, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.