Conditional tradeoffs between aging and organismal performance of Indy long-lived mutant flies

Alterations that extend the life span of animals and yeast typically involve decreases in metabolic rate, growth, physical activity, and/or early-life fecundity. This negative correlation between life span and the ability to assimilate and process energy, to move, grow, and reproduce, raises questions about the potential utility of life span extension. Tradeoffs between early-life fitness and longevity are central to theories of the evolution of aging, which suggests there is necessarily a price to be paid for reducing the rate of aging. It is not yet clear whether life span can be extended without undesirable effects on metabolism and fecundity. Here, we report that the long-lived Indy mutation in Drosophila causes a decrease in the slope of the mortality curve consistent with a slowing in the rate of aging without a concomitant reduction in resting metabolic rate, flight velocity, or age-specific fecundity under normal rearing conditions. However, Indy mutants on a decreased-calorie diet have reduced fecundity, suggesting that a tradeoff between longevity and this aspect of performance is conditional, i.e., the tradeoff can occur in a stressful environment while being absent in a more favorable environment. These results provide evidence that there do exist mechanisms, albeit conditional, that can extend life span without significant reduction in fecundity, metabolic rate, or locomotion.

[1]  A. Bartke Delayed aging in Ames dwarf mice. Relationships to endocrine function and body size. , 2000, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[2]  J. Curtsinger,et al.  Why do life spans differ? Partitioning mean longevity differences in terms of age-specific mortality parameters. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[3]  Linda Partridge,et al.  Mechanisms of aging: public or private? , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  L. Partridge,et al.  Optimally, mutation and the evolution of ageing , 1993, Nature.

[5]  B. Rogina,et al.  Extended life-span conferred by cotransporter gene mutations in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[6]  V. Ganapathy,et al.  Functional identity of Drosophila melanogaster Indy as a cation-independent, electroneutral transporter for tricarboxylic acid-cycle intermediates. , 2002, The Biochemical journal.

[7]  Patricia A. Foley,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SELECTION FOR LARVAL BEHAVIOR ON ADULT LIFE‐HISTORY FEATURES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  L. Partridge,et al.  Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Andrzej Bartke,et al.  Longevity: Extending the lifespan of long-lived mice , 2001, Nature.

[10]  M. Mangel Complex adaptive systems, aging and longevity. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  R. S. Sohal,et al.  Relationship between physical activity and life span in the adult housefly, Musca domestica , 1981, Experimental Gerontology.

[12]  Edward J Masoro,et al.  Caloric restriction and aging: an update , 2000, Experimental Gerontology.

[13]  S. Ward,et al.  Genetic and environmental conditions that increase longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans decrease metabolic rate. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Benzer,et al.  Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methuselah. , 1998, Science.

[15]  Steven N. Austad,et al.  Why do we age? , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Masoro Ej Hormesis is the beneficial action resulting from the response of an organism to a low-intensity stressor. , 2000 .

[17]  E. Hafen,et al.  Extension of Life-Span by Loss of CHICO, a Drosophila Insulin Receptor Substrate Protein , 2001, Science.

[18]  W. D. Kaplan,et al.  A relation between longevity, metabolic rate, and activity in shaker mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1970, Experimental gerontology.

[19]  G. Lithgow,et al.  Evolution of lifespan in C. elegans , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Caleb E. Finch,et al.  Longevity, senescence, and the genome , 1990 .

[21]  H. Atlan,et al.  Effects of temperature on the life span, vitality and fine structure of Drosophila melanogaster , 1976, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[22]  B. Rogina,et al.  Functional characterization and immunolocalization of the transporter encoded by the life-extending gene Indy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  C. Kenyon A Conserved Regulatory System for Aging , 2001, Cell.

[24]  Pletcher Model fitting and hypothesis testing for age‐specific mortality data , 1999 .

[25]  K E Weber,et al.  Aerial performance of Drosophila melanogaster from populations selected for upwind flight ability. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  R. Weindruch,et al.  Oxidative Stress, Caloric Restriction, and Aging , 1996, Science.

[27]  G. Ruvkun,et al.  The genetics of aging. , 1997, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[28]  T. Kirkwood Evolution of ageing , 2002, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[29]  M. Tatar,et al.  A Mutant Drosophila Insulin Receptor Homolog That Extends Life-Span and Impairs Neuroendocrine Function , 2001, Science.

[30]  L. Partridge,et al.  Evolutionary theories of ageing applied to long-lived organisms , 2001, Experimental Gerontology.