Fractionating the Cognitive Control Required to Bring About a Change in Task: A Dense-sensor Event-related Potential Study

The ability to change our behavior is one that we frequently exert, although determining the mechanisms by which we do so is far from trivial. Task switching is a useful experimental paradigm for studying cognitive control functions. Switching between tasks is associated with a decrement in performance, or switch-cost, relative to repeating the same task. We have previously demonstrated that this cost is dependent on switching from performing one task to performing another; changing only our intended performance does not elicit the same performance deficit. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we dissociated two electrophysiological indices mirroring this behavioral distinction [Astle, D. E., Jackson, G. M., & Swainson, R. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: An ERP study of task switching. Brain Res, 1125, 94103, 2006]. However, what was unclear were the specific aspects of performance that were critical for triggering the neural mechanisms associated specifically with switching from a previously performed task. Two candidate aspects were: (i) that performance required a physical response and (ii) that the two tasks shared their responses (they had bivalent response mappings). The present study therefore compared three separate groups to explore the effects of these different aspects of performance. Each group completed the same basic task-switching paradigm, but with either an overt response or covert response, and either switching between tasks that shared their responses (bivalent response mappings) or had separate responses (univalent response mappings). When comparing precue-locked ERPs, we observed three separable components: one common to all three groups, one which primarily dissociated overt from covert responding, and one which primarily dissociated bivalent from univalent responding. We therefore concluded that changing our behavior engages at least three dissociable mechanisms. Interestingly, in the overt conditions, residual switch-costs were absent; in addition, therefore, we concluded that it is possible to engage cognitive control in advance, such that the new behavior is as efficient as were the subject to have repeated the old behavior.

[1]  Frini Karayanidis,et al.  ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues , 2006, Brain Research.

[2]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[3]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[5]  R. Cunnington,et al.  ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching , 2001 .

[6]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[7]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  L. M. Jonkmana,et al.  Dipole source localization of event-related brain activity indicative of an early visual selective attention deficit in ADHD children , 2004 .

[9]  A Kok,et al.  Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  F. Tornay,et al.  A More Complete Task-Set Reconfiguration in Random than in Predictable Task Switch , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D. E. Astle,et al.  Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: An ERP study of task switching , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  M. Brass,et al.  Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  R. Griffiths,et al.  The Role of Dopamine in the Behavioral Effects of Caffeine in Animals and Humans , 1997, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[16]  N. Yeung,et al.  Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. Mangun,et al.  Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Task-Set Switching Deficits in Early-Stage Huntington's Disease: Implications for Basal Ganglia Function , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Tor D Wager,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Components of Switching Intentional Set , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Tucker,et al.  Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Durk Talsma,et al.  Generating spatial and nonspatial attentional control: An ERP study. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Paul D. Kieffaber,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[25]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Dissociating Task-set Selection from Task-set Inhibition in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  l-Dopa medication remediates cognitive inflexibility, but increases impulsivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  S. R. Jackson,et al.  Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: An ERP study of task-switching , 2006, Brain Research.

[28]  T. Allison,et al.  Modulation of human extrastriate visual processing by selective attention to colours and words. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[30]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[32]  C. Rorden,et al.  Cognitive Control Mechanisms Revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from Repeated Task-Switching , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  F. Barceló The Madrid card sorting test (MCST): a task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[34]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue , 2004, Neuroreport.

[35]  W. Schultz,et al.  Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[36]  G. Potts An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  E. Crone,et al.  Neural evidence for dissociable components of task-switching. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of brain electrical fields , 1994 .

[39]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[40]  Müller Sc Contributions of task- and response-level factors to the asymmetrical switch cost. , 2006 .

[41]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .

[43]  M. Brass,et al.  Decomposing Components of Task Preparation with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[45]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[46]  A C Nobre,et al.  Components of attentional set-switching. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[47]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of the effects of within- and across-modality word repetition , 1993 .

[48]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[49]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[50]  G. Jackson,et al.  Enhanced Cognitive Control in Young People with Tourette's Syndrome , 2006, Current Biology.

[51]  A. Allport,et al.  Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection , 1999 .

[52]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  K. A. Hadland,et al.  Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.