The Dynamics of Foraging Trails in the Tropical Arboreal Ant Cephalotes goniodontus

The foraging behavior of the arboreal turtle ant, Cephalotes goniodontus, was studied in the tropical dry forest of western Mexico. The ants collected mostly plant-derived food, including nectar and fluids collected from the edges of wounds on leaves, as well as caterpillar frass and lichen. Foraging trails are on small pieces of ephemeral vegetation, and persist in exactly the same place for 4–8 days, indicating that food sources may be used until they are depleted. The species is polydomous, occupying many nests which are abandoned cavities or ends of broken branches in dead wood. Foraging trails extend from trees with nests to trees with food sources. Observations of marked individuals show that each trail is travelled by a distinct group of foragers. This makes the entire foraging circuit more resilient if a path becomes impassable, since foraging in one trail can continue while a different group of ants forms a new trail. The colony’s trails move around the forest from month to month; from one year to the next, only one colony out of five was found in the same location. There is continual searching in the vicinity of trails: ants recruited to bait within 3 bifurcations of a main foraging trail within 4 hours. When bait was offered on one trail, to which ants recruited, foraging activity increased on a different trail, with no bait, connected to the same nest. This suggests that the allocation of foragers to different trails is regulated by interactions at the nest.

[1]  W. S. Creighton Studies on Free Colonies of Cryptocerus Texanus Santschi(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1967 .

[2]  D. McKey,et al.  Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. , 2003 .

[3]  D. Gordon,et al.  Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants , 2008, Insectes Sociaux.

[4]  F. Zara,et al.  Contribution of the Malpighian tubules for the maintenance of symbiotic microorganisms in cephalotes ants. , 2008, Micron.

[5]  N. Sanders,et al.  An Ant Mosaic Revisited: Dominant Ant Species Disassemble Arboreal Ant Communities but Co‐Occur Randomly , 2007 .

[6]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  Behavioral Diversity of Predatory Arboreal Ants in Coffee Agroecosystems , 2008, Environmental entomology.

[7]  D. Davidson,et al.  Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications , 2005, Oecologia.

[8]  D. Gordon,et al.  The allocation of foragers in red wood ants , 1992 .

[9]  R. Dudley,et al.  Directed aerial descent in canopy ants , 2005, Nature.

[10]  K. Del‐Claro,et al.  Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities , 2010, acta ethologica.

[11]  D. Davidson,et al.  Explaining the Abundance of Ants in Lowland Tropical Rainforest Canopies , 2003, Science.

[12]  T. Itioka,et al.  Within-tree distribution of nest sites and foraging areas of ants on canopy trees in a tropical rainforest in Borneo , 2009, Population Ecology.

[13]  E. Adams Interaction between the ants Zacryptocerus maculatus and Azteca trigona: interspecific parasitization of information. , 1990 .

[14]  Christian Scheideler,et al.  Algorithms Unplugged , 2011, Algorithms Unplugged.

[15]  J. Ayroles,et al.  Insect behaviour: Arboreal ants build traps to capture prey , 2005, Nature.

[16]  M. Kaspari,et al.  Community structure and the habitat templet: ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter , 2000 .

[17]  Yunju La,et al.  Arboreal substrates influence foraging in tropical ants , 2010 .

[18]  M. L. de Andrade,et al.  Pollen Eating, Storing, and Spitting by Ants , 1997, Naturwissenschaften.

[19]  C. Urbani,et al.  Diversity and adaptation in the ant genus Cephalotes, past and present , 1999 .

[20]  F. Roces,et al.  Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[21]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Sensitivity of ant (Cephalotes) colonies and individuals to antibiotics implies feeding symbiosis with gut microorganisms , 2001 .

[22]  S. Powell,et al.  Canopy connectivity and the availability of diverse nesting resources affect species coexistence in arboreal ants. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  David J. Lohman,et al.  Bacterial gut symbionts are tightly linked with the evolution of herbivory in ants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  V. Rico‐Gray Ants and Tropical Flowers , 1980 .

[25]  W. Barthlott,et al.  How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew , 2000, Oecologia.

[26]  C. Moreau,et al.  Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[27]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[28]  D. Gordon The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants , 1993, Oecologia.

[29]  S. Powell How ecology shapes caste evolution: linking resource use, morphology, performance and fitness in a superorganism , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  M. Heil,et al.  The Role of Extrafloral Nectar Amino Acids for the Preferences of Facultative and Obligate Ant Mutualists , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[31]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[32]  S. Powell Ecological specialization and the evolution of a specialized caste in Cephalotes ants , 2008 .