Capability and Fidelity of Mote-Class Wireless Sniffers

Monitoring the health of a sensor network is important for maintaining the health and normal operation of the network. For large-scale cost- effective monitoring, using inexpensive motes as sniffers is an attractive choice. In this paper, we quantify the capability and fidelity of mote-class sniffers for sensor network monitoring. In particular, we experimentally quantify the sustainable workload and the accuracy of delay and loss measurements by these types of sniffers. We find that (1) a sniffer can monitor traffic at the rate of 60 packets per second with little buffer overflow, (2) per-hop loss measurements from sniffers exhibit variations but are comparable to those at the receiver and (3) per-hop delay measurements from a sniffer are accurate (the errors are up to 300 μs). Our results indicate that measurement quality by mote-class sniffers is satisfactory for many monitoring purposes.

[1]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Delay monitoring for wireless sensor networks: An architecture using air sniffers , 2009, MILCOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[2]  David E. Culler,et al.  Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceeedings of the Second European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks, 2005..

[3]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Visibility: a new metric for protocol design , 2007, SenSys '07.

[4]  Richard Han,et al.  NodeMD: diagnosing node-level faults in remote wireless sensor systems , 2007, MobiSys '07.

[5]  Fikret Sivrikaya,et al.  Time synchronization in sensor networks: a survey , 2004, IEEE Network.

[6]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Residual Energy Scans for Monitoring Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[7]  O. Brun,et al.  Analytical solution of finite capacity M/D/1 queues , 2000, Journal of Applied Probability.

[8]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Deployment Support Network , 2007, EWSN.

[9]  Kay Römer,et al.  Passive Inspection of Sensor Networks , 2007, DCOSS.

[10]  Christian Poellabauer,et al.  Wireless reliability: Rethinking 802.11 packet loss , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[11]  Prashant J. Shenoy,et al.  SRCP: Simple Remote Control for Perpetual High-Power Sensor Networks , 2009, EWSN.

[12]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Deployment support network a toolkit for the development of WSNs , 2007 .

[13]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Memento: A Health Monitoring System for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[14]  Michael Zink,et al.  Assessing the Fidelity of COTS 802.11 Sniffers , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Sympathy for the sensor network debugger , 2005, SenSys '05.