CONTEXT
Value-based purchasing by employers has often been portrayed as the lynchpin to quality improvement in a market-based health care system. Although a small group of the largest national employers has been actively engaged in promoting quality measurement, reporting, and pay for performance, it is unknown whether these ideas have significantly permeated employer-sponsored health benefit purchasing.
OBJECTIVE
To provide systematic descriptions and analyses of value-based purchasing and related efforts to improve quality of care by health care purchasers.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
We conducted telephone interviews with executives at 609 of the largest employers across 41 US markets between July 2005 and March 2006. The 41 randomly selected markets have at least 100,000 persons enrolled in health maintenance organizations, include approximately 91% of individuals enrolled in health maintenance organizations nationally, and represent roughly 78% of the US metropolitan population. Using the Dun & Bradstreet database of US employers, we identified the 26 largest firms in each market. Firms ranged in size from 60 to 250,000 employees.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The degree to which value-based purchasing and related strategies are reported being used by employers. Percentages were weighted by number of employees.
RESULTS
Of 1041 companies contacted, 609 employer representatives completed the survey (response rate, 64%). A large percentage of surveyed executives reported that they examine health plan quality data (269 respondents; 65% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 57%-74%]; P<.001), but few reported using it for performance rewards (49 respondents; 17% [95% CI, 7%-27%]; P=.008) or to influence employees (71 respondents; 23% [95% CI, 13%-33%]). Physician quality information is even less commonly examined (71 respondents; 16% [95% CI, 9%-23%]) or used by employers to reward performance (8 respondents; 2% [95% CI, 0%-3%]) or influence employee choice of providers (34 respondents; 8% [95% CI, 3%-12%]).
CONCLUSION
Surveyed employers as a whole do not appear to be individually implementing incentives and programs in line with value-based purchasing ideals.
[1]
D. Levy.
Employer-sponsored insurance coverage of smoking cessation treatments.
,
2006,
The American journal of managed care.
[2]
D. Nash,et al.
Are employers pursuing value-based purchasing?
,
2005,
Benefits quarterly.
[3]
Arnold Milstein,et al.
Has the leapfrog group had an impact on the health care market?
,
2005,
Health affairs.
[4]
P. Basch.
Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
,
2003,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
Alain C Enthoven,et al.
Paying for performance: Medicare should lead.
,
2003,
Health affairs.
[6]
P. Temin,et al.
Corporate Management of Quality in Employee Health Plans
,
2003,
Health care management review.
[7]
P. Temin,et al.
Managed Competition versus Industrial Purchasing of Health Care among the Fortune 500
,
2002,
Journal of health politics, policy and law.
[8]
Alastair Baker,et al.
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
,
2001,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9]
M. Marquis,et al.
Prevalence of selected employer health insurance purchasing strategies in 1997.
,
2001,
Health affairs.
[10]
P. Temin,et al.
Corporate health care purchasing among Fortune 500 firms.
,
2001,
Health affairs.
[11]
P. Temin,et al.
Managed competition in practice: 'value purchasing' by fourteen employers.
,
1998,
Health affairs.
[12]
H. Aaron.
Budget limits and managed competition: allies, not antagonists.
,
1993,
Health affairs.
[13]
S. Sofaer.
Informing and protecting consumers under managed competition.
,
1993,
Health affairs.
[14]
P. Starr,et al.
A bridge to compromise: competition under a budget.
,
1993,
Health affairs.
[15]
A. Enthoven,et al.
The Jackson Hole initiatives for a twenty-first century American health care system.
,
1992,
Health economics.