Finding a Weighted Positive In uence Dominating Set in E-learning Social Networks

Online social network has developed significantly in recent years. Most of current research has utilized the property of online social network to spread information and ideas. Motivated by the applications of dominating set in social networks (such as e-learning), a variation of the dominating set called positive influence dominating set (PIDS) has been studied in the literature. The existing research for PIDS problem do not take into consideration the attributes, directions and degrees of personal influence. However, these factors are very important for selecting a better PIDS. For example, in a real-life e-learning community, the attributes and the degrees of their influence between a tutor and a student are different; the relationship between two e-learning users is asymmetrical. Hence, comprehensive, deep investigation of user’s properties become an emerging and urgent issue. The focus of this study is on the degree and direction between e-learners’ influence. A novel dominating set model called weighted positive influence dominating set (WPIDS), and two selection algorithms for the WPIDS problem have been proposed. Experiments using synthetic data sets demonstrate that the proposed model and algorithms are more reasonable and effective than those of the positive influence dominating set (PIDS) without considering the key factors of weight, direction and so on.

[1]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[2]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and In stractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H Freeman, San Fran , 1979 .

[3]  Scott T. Walters,et al.  Addressing Drinking Among College Students , 2000 .

[4]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[5]  Hongchi Shi,et al.  An agent enabling personalized learning in e-learning environments , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[6]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Structural and algorithmic aspects of massive social networks , 2004, SODA '04.

[7]  J. Standridge,et al.  Alcohol Consumption: An Overview of Benefits and Risks , 2004, Southern medical journal.

[8]  James Jaccard,et al.  Peer influences on risk behavior: an analysis of the effects of a close friend. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[9]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[10]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[11]  S. Garruzzo,et al.  MASHA-EL: A Multi-Agent System for Supporting Adaptive E-Learning , 2007 .

[12]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  ISABEL: A Multi Agent e-Learning System That Supports Multiple Devices , 2007, IAT.

[13]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[14]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[15]  Wei Wei,et al.  Measuring credibility of users in an e-learning environment , 2007, WWW '07.

[16]  Tuncer Ören,et al.  Agents with personality and emotional filters for an e-learning environment , 2008, SpringSim '08.

[17]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[18]  Eleftherios Kayafas,et al.  Collaborative e-learning environments enhanced by wiki technologies , 2008, PETRA '08.

[19]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[20]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Chen-Nee Chuah,et al.  Unveiling facebook: a measurement study of social network based applications , 2008, IMC '08.

[22]  Yanchun Zhang,et al.  Effective Collaboration with Information Sharing in Virtual Universities , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[23]  Kuai Xu,et al.  Positive Influence Dominating Set in Online Social Networks , 2009, COCOA.

[24]  Donghyun Kim,et al.  New dominating sets in social networks , 2010, J. Glob. Optim..

[25]  Yan Shi,et al.  On positive influence dominating sets in social networks , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[26]  Birgitta König-Ries,et al.  Comparative social visualization for personalized e-learning , 2012, AVI.

[27]  Mohammad Reza Meybodi,et al.  Finding minimum weight connected dominating set in stochastic graph based on learning automata , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[28]  My T. Thai,et al.  A Unified Approach for Domination Problems on Different Network Topologies , 2013 .

[29]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..