Kea show three signatures of domain-general statistical inference

One key aspect of domain-general thought is the ability to integrate information across different cognitive domains. Here, we tested whether kea ( Nestor notabilis ) can use relative quantities when predicting sampling outcomes, and then integrate both physical information about the presence of a barrier, and social information about the biased sampling of an experimenter, into their predictions. Our results show that kea exhibit three signatures of statistical inference, and therefore can integrate knowledge across different cognitive domains to flexibly adjust their predictions of sampling events. This result provides evidence that true statistical inference is found outside of the great apes, and that aspects of domain-general thinking can convergently evolve in brains with a highly different structure from primates. This has important implications not only for our understanding of how intelligence evolves, but also for research focused on how to create artificial domain-general thought processes. Previously only humans and the great apes have been shown to use probabilities to make predictions about uncertain events, and integrate social and physical information into their predictions. Here, the authors demonstrate these capacities in a parrot species, the kea.

[1]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[2]  John Dupré,et al.  The Latest on the best : essays on evolution and optimality , 1987 .

[3]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence , 2017, Neuron.

[4]  S. Denison,et al.  BRIEF REPORT The Emergence of Probabilistic Reasoning in Very Young Infants: Evidence From 4.5- and 6-Month-Olds , 2012 .

[5]  W. Fitch,et al.  Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[7]  J. Lygeros,et al.  Decision Making I , 2014 .

[8]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Goffin's cockatoos make the same tool type from different materials , 2016, Biology Letters.

[9]  S. Mithen The Prehistory of the Mind , 1996 .

[10]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Fei Xu,et al.  Integrating Physical Constraints in Statistical Inference by 11-Month-Old Infants , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  M. Benton,et al.  Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Leda Cosmides,et al.  The Latest on the Best Essays on Evolution and Optimality---- , 2005 .

[14]  A. Bayern,et al.  Who’s a clever bird — now? A brief history of parrot cognition , 2019, Behaviour.

[15]  A. M. I. Auersperg,et al.  Flexible decision-making relative to reward quality and tool functionality in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana) , 2016, Scientific reports.

[16]  D. Premack Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  John Tooby,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the brain , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  I. Pepperberg,et al.  Initial Evidence for Probabilistic Reasoning in a Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus) , 2018, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  R. Cattell,et al.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Nathan J Emery,et al.  Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Hannes Rakoczy,et al.  Apes are intuitive statisticians , 2014, Cognition.

[22]  S. Shettleworth Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[26]  Lili Ma,et al.  Young children’s use of statistical sampling evidence to infer the subjectivity of preferences , 2011, Cognition.

[27]  H. Wellman,et al.  Young Children Use Statistical Sampling to Infer the Preferences of Other People , 2010, Psychological science.

[28]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infants Use Statistical Sampling to Understand the Psychological World , 2016 .

[29]  Sarah Placì,et al.  Long-tailed macaques extract statistical information from repeated types of events to make rational decisions under uncertainty , 2019 .

[30]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Flexibility in Problem Solving and Tool Use of Kea and New Caledonian Crows in a Multi Access Box Paradigm , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Planning for the future by western scrub-jays , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Alex H. Taylor,et al.  Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Cognition without Cortex , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  L. Huber,et al.  Navigating a tool end in a specific direction: stick-tool use in kea (Nestor notabilis) , 2011, Biology Letters.

[35]  N. Emery Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. 2nd edn. By Sara J. Shettleworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009). Pp. xiii+700. Price $59.95 paperback. , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Martin Schmelz,et al.  Cognitive test batteries in animal cognition research: evaluating the past, present and future of comparative psychometrics , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[37]  A M I Auersperg,et al.  Compound tool construction by New Caledonian crows , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Edward Vul,et al.  Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference , 2011, Science.

[39]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997 .

[40]  H. Rakoczy,et al.  Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) can use simple heuristics but fail at drawing statistical inferences from populations to samples , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[41]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Call,et al.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  W. Roberts,et al.  Pigeons play the percentages: computation of probability in a bird , 2018, Animal Cognition.

[44]  P. Carruthers The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  I. Teschke,et al.  Did tool-use evolve with enhanced physical cognitive abilities? , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[47]  Alex H. Taylor,et al.  Spontaneous Metatool Use by New Caledonian Crows , 2007, Current Biology.

[48]  Kenneth R. Light,et al.  Covariation of learning and "reasoning" abilities in mice: evolutionary conservation of the operations of intelligence. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[49]  Emma C Tecwyn,et al.  Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[50]  New Caledonian Crows Use Mental Representations to Solve Metatool Problems , 2019, Current Biology.

[51]  J. Call,et al.  Intuitive statistical inferences in chimpanzees and humans follow Weber’s law , 2018, Cognition.

[52]  L. Huber,et al.  Kea, Nestor notabilis, produce dynamic relationships between objects in a second-order tool use task , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  S. Denison,et al.  Statistical inference and sensitivity to sampling in 11-month-old infants , 2009, Cognition.

[54]  Joanna M Dally,et al.  Food-Caching Western Scrub-Jays Keep Track of Who Was Watching When , 2006, Science.

[55]  Stephanie Denison,et al.  The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants , 2014, Cognition.

[56]  X. Nelson,et al.  Intraspecific variation in the foraging ecology of kea, the world's only mountain- and rainforest-dwelling parrot , 2015 .

[57]  Judith M Burkart,et al.  G but not g: In search of the evolutionary continuity of intelligence , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Bradley J. Barney,et al.  A Modular Mind? A Test Using Individual Data from Seven Primate Species , 2012, PloS one.

[59]  N. Emery,et al.  Investigating Physical Cognition in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus , 2006, Current Biology.

[60]  J. Stevens,et al.  The domain specificity of intertemporal choice in pinyon jays , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  D. Premack Why Humans Are Unique: Three Theories , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[62]  N. Emery,et al.  Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays , 2001, Nature.

[63]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  The Cognitive Processes of Formal Inferences , 2007, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[64]  Jackie Chappell,et al.  Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) , 2002, Animal Cognition.

[65]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[66]  Britt Anderson,et al.  Evidence from the rat for a general factor that underlies cognitive performance and that relates to brain size: intelligence? , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[67]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Genetics of intelligence , 2006, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[68]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  A New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[69]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Cognitive Processes Associated with Sequential Tool Use in New Caledonian Crows , 2009, PloS one.

[70]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[71]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[72]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Language in mind , 2004 .

[73]  N. Clayton,et al.  Wild psychometrics: evidence for ‘general’ cognitive performance in wild New Zealand robins, Petroica longipes , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  Philippa R. Laker,et al.  Intra-individual variation in performance on novel variants of similar tasks influences single factor explanations of general cognitive processes , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[75]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[76]  Gilbert Ritschard,et al.  Coefficient-wise tree-based varying coefficient regression with vcrpart , 2017 .

[77]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[78]  A. Rosati,et al.  Rhesus macaques use probabilities to predict future events. , 2019, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[79]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo , 2012, Current Biology.

[80]  J. Call,et al.  Chimpanzees Consider Humans’ Psychological States when Drawing Statistical Inferences , 2018, Current Biology.

[81]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[82]  Alex H. Taylor Corvid cognition. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[83]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.