A spatial-temporal-spectral blending model using satellite images

Due to the budget and technical limitations, remote sensing sensor designs trade spatial resolution, swath width and spectral resolution. Consequently, no sensor can provide high spatial resolution, high temporal resolution and high spectral resolution simultaneously. However, the ability of Earth observation at fine resolution is urgently needed for global change science. One possible solution is to "blend" the reflectance from a variety of satellite data sources, including those providing high spatial resolution and less frequent coverage (e.g., Landsat Thematic Mapper, TM), daily global data (e.g., Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, MODIS), and high spectral resolution and infrequent revisit cycle (e.g., Hyperion). However, the previous algorithms for blending multi-source remotely sensed data have some shortcomings, especially with regard to hyperspectral information. This study has developed a SPAtial-Temporal-Spectral blending model (SPATS) that can simulate surface reflectance with high spatial-temporal-spectral resolution. SPATS is based on an existing spatial-temporal image blending model and a spatial-spectral image blending model. The performance of SPATS was tested with both simulated and observed satellite data, using Landsat TM, Hyperion and MODIS data, as well as heterogeneous landscapes as examples. The results show that the high spatial-temporal-spectral resolution reflectance data can be applied to investigations of global landscapes that are changing at different temporal scales.

[1]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Simulation of EO-1 Hyperion Data from ALI Multispectral Data Based on the Spectral Reconstruction Approach , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  Yifan Zhang,et al.  Noise-Resistant Wavelet-Based Bayesian Fusion of Multispectral and Hyperspectral Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Yi Guo,et al.  Enhancement of Spectral Resolution for Remotely Sensed Multispectral Image , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[4]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  MAP estimation for hyperspectral image resolution enhancement using an auxiliary sensor , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Coupled Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Unmixing for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Data Fusion , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  Application of the stochastic mixing model to hyperspectral resolution enhancement , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of blending Landsat–MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection , 2013 .

[9]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Xiaolin Zhu,et al.  An enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model for complex heterogeneous regions , 2010 .

[11]  M.E. Winter,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Sharpening Using Multispectral Data , 2005, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[12]  T. Meyers,et al.  Estimating landscape net ecosystem exchange at high spatial–temporal resolution based on Landsat data, an improved upscaling model framework, and eddy covariance flux measurements , 2014 .