Sexual Attraction and Inter-sexual Dominance among Virtual Agents

In many group-living primates, males are dominant over females, but despite this dominance, they allow females access to resources during the period when females are sexually attractive - but only then and not otherwise. Conventionally, such male 'courtesy' is explained as a special strategy to gain mating access to females. In the present paper I propose a simpler hypothesis that is based on an agentcentered model, namely that male 'courtesy' to females is in fact a kind of 'timidity' that arises because sexual attraction automatically increases female dominance. The model consists in a homogeneous, virtual world with agents that group and perform dominance interactions. VirtualMales have a higher intensity of aggression and start with a greater capacity to win conflicts than VirtualFemales. I shall explain how the addition of attraction of VirtualMales by VirtualFemales leads to female dominance, and other phenomena that are relevant to the study of animal behaviour.

[1]  C. Schaik Why Are Diurnal Primates Living in Groups , 1983 .

[2]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  Risk Sensitive and Ambiguity Reducing Dominance Interactions in a Virtual Laboratory. , 1998 .

[3]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to self-structuring , 1996 .

[4]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[5]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Reinforcing Dominance Interactions Between Virtual Males and Females. Hypothesis Generation for Primate Studies , 2000, Adaptive Behavior.

[6]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Cooperation Without Genes, Games Or Cognition , 1997 .

[7]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  ‘Friendship’ for fitness in chimpanzees? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Effects of Cohesiveness on Inter-sexual Dominance Relationships and Spatial Structure among Group-Living Virtual Entities , 1999, ECAL.

[10]  Carolyn L. Ehardt,et al.  Intragroup agonistic behavior in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 1985 .

[11]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[13]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[14]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Spatial Centrality of Dominants Without Positional Preference , 1998 .

[15]  R. Yerkes,et al.  Social behavior of chimpanzees: dominance between mates, in relation to sexual status. , 1940 .

[16]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1957 .

[17]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  R. Yerkes Social Dominance and Sexual Status in the Chimpanzee , 1939, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Mirror Beyond Mirror: Puddles of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[20]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees , 1989 .

[22]  C. Hemelrijk An individual–orientated model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world , 1996 .

[24]  B A Huberman,et al.  Evolutionary games and computer simulations. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Harcourt The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Patterns of Behavior, Jane Goodall. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets (1986), xii, +671. Price $30 , 1988 .

[26]  R. Michael,et al.  Aggression and gonadal hormones in captive Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 1970, Animal behaviour.

[27]  P. Turchin,et al.  An Incidental-Effect Hypothesis Explaining Aggregation of Males in a Population of Euphydryas anicia , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  A model study on biomorphological description , 1974, Pattern Recognit..

[29]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies , 1996 .