Discrete choice models with q-product random utilities

While most existing closed-form discrete choice models can be regarded as special cases of McFadden's generalized extreme value model, recently, alternative frameworks of McFadden's generalized extreme value model, which maintain closed-form expressions, have been proposed; these include the weibit model, which uses the Weibull distribution for its random component. In this paper, we develop a generalized closed-form discrete choice model which include both logit and weibit models as special cases, by introducing the q-product random utility, in which the relationship between the systematic component and the random component can be either additive, multiplicative, or in-between, depending on the value of the parameter q. We show that, when imposing the Gumbel distribution on its error component (instead of assuming the additive case as the logit model), the parameter q depicts decision maker's risk attitude in the sense of the Arrow–Pratt measure of relative risk aversion, which would be a behavioral foundation of the model. We also show that the model can be straightforwardly extended to incorporate statistical dependence across alternatives. The performance of the proposed model is examined by using two case studies; one on travel-route choices and the other on transport-mode choices.

[1]  Yosef Sheffi,et al.  Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis With Mathematical Programming Methods , 1985 .

[2]  Roberta Di Pace,et al.  The impact of travel information's accuracy on route-choice , 2013 .

[3]  P. Weil Nonexpected Utility in Macroeconomics , 1990 .

[4]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Unconstrained weibit stochastic user equilibrium model with extensions , 2014 .

[5]  Hiroki Suyari,et al.  Law of Multiplicative Error and Its Generalization to the Correlated Observations Represented by the q-Product , 2013, Entropy.

[6]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  Persistency Model and Its Applications in Choice Modeling , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[7]  C. Tsallis Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World , 2009 .

[8]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[9]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[10]  Andrew B. Abel,et al.  Asset Prices Under Habit Formation and Catching Up with the Joneses , 1990 .

[11]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  P. Samuelson Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming , 1969 .

[13]  Q. A. Wang,et al.  Generalized algebra within a nonextensive statistics , 2003, math-ph/0303061.

[14]  Seiji Iwakura,et al.  Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior , 1997 .

[15]  D. McFadden A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration , 1989 .

[16]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms , 2009 .

[17]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  On Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Marginal Distribution Choice Models , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Per Olov Lindberg,et al.  Extreme values, invariance and choice probabilities , 2011 .

[19]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  STRUCTURE OF PASSENGER TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1974 .

[20]  S. Ahipasaoglu,et al.  On the flexibility of using marginal distribution choice models in traffic equilibrium , 2016 .

[21]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[22]  A. Atkinson On the measurement of inequality , 1970 .

[23]  M. Silvio,et al.  On generalisations of the log-Normal distribution by means of a new product definition in the Kapteyn process , 2012 .

[24]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[25]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  A General and Operational Representation of Generalised Extreme Value Models , 2006 .

[26]  Baibing Li The multinomial logit model revisited: A semi-parametric approach in discrete choice analysis , 2011 .

[27]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings , 2006 .

[28]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application , 2000 .

[29]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[30]  C. Bhat A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice , 1995 .

[31]  Shoichiro Nakayama,et al.  Unified closed-form expression of logit and weibit and its extension to a transportation network equilibrium assignment , 2015 .

[32]  S. Kitthamkesorn,et al.  A path-size weibit stochastic user equilibrium model , 2013 .

[33]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Closed form expressions for choice probabilities in the Weibull case , 2008 .

[34]  M. Fosgerau,et al.  Valuing travel time variability: Characteristics of the travel time distribution on an urban road , 2012 .

[35]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Choice Probability Generating Functions , 2012 .

[36]  Ernesto P. Borges A possible deformed algebra and calculus inspired in nonextensive thermostatistics , 2003, cond-mat/0304545.