Structural basis for androgen receptor agonists and antagonists: interaction of SPEED 98-listed chemicals and related compounds with the androgen receptor based on an in vitro reporter gene assay and 3D-QSAR.

The androgen receptor (AR) activity of listed chemicals, so called SPEED 98, by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and structurally related chemicals was characterized using MDA-kb2 human breast cancer cells stably expressing an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene, MMTV-luc. Since our results suggested that chemicals with diverse chemical structures were capable of disrupting the endocrine systems mediated by AR, a comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model was developed to analyze the structural requirements necessary to disrupt AR function. A significant CoMFA model with r(2)=0.825 and q(2)=0.332 was developed for AR antagonist activity of 35 pure antagonists excluding procymidone. On the other hand, a good CoMFA model with r(2)=0.983 and q(2)=0.555 was obtained for antagonist activity of 13 chemicals with both agonist and antagonist activities. The steric and electrostatic properties were sufficient to describe the structural requirements for AR antagonist activity. In addition, the structural difference of AR agonists and antagonists was explained based on CoMFA results and the AR-LBD crystal structure. As several ERalpha agonists such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) acted as AR antagonists, the surface area of the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD) was compared with that of the ERalpha-LBD based on their reported crystal structures to analyze how those ligands interact with LBDs. The surface area of AR-LBD was shown to be smaller than that of ERalpha-LBD and therefore compounds with both estrogenic and antiandrogenic activities can fit well into the ERalpha-LBD but may protrude from the AR-LBD. It is likely that this subtle difference of the surface areas of the LBDs determines whether an ERalpha agonist acts as an AR antagonist or an agonist.

[1]  T. Iguchi,et al.  Comparison of antiandrogenic activities of vinclozolin and D,L-camphorquinone in androgen receptor gene transcription assay in vitro and mouse in utero exposure assay in vivo. , 2002, Toxicology.

[2]  Fred Schaufele,et al.  The structural basis of androgen receptor activation: intramolecular and intermolecular amino-carboxy interactions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  L. Gray,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure--activity relationships for androgen receptor ligands. , 1996, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[4]  J. Stewart Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I. Method , 1989 .

[5]  M. Dewar,et al.  Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Method. Approximations and Parameters , 1977 .

[6]  Zbigniew Dauter,et al.  Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor , 1997, Nature.

[7]  J. Furr,et al.  Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP, and DINP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male rat. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  T. Nyrönen,et al.  Three-dimensional structure-activity relationships of nonsteroidal ligands in complex with androgen receptor ligand-binding domain. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  H. Tucker,et al.  Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  P. Foster,et al.  Dose-dependent alterations in androgen-regulated male reproductive development in rats exposed to Di(n-butyl) phthalate during late gestation. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  A. Richard,et al.  Interaction of organophosphate pesticides and related compounds with the androgen receptor. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  A Computationally-Based Hazard Identification Algorithm That Incorporates Ligand Flexibility. 1. Identification of Potential Androgen Receptor Ligands , 1997 .

[14]  C. Sultan,et al.  Molecular action of androgens , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[15]  Yoshihiro Hori,et al.  Effects of a diphenyl ether-type herbicide, chlornitrofen, and its amino derivative on androgen and estrogen receptor activities. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  Bin He,et al.  Structural basis for androgen receptor interdomain and coactivator interactions suggests a transition in nuclear receptor activation function dominance. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[17]  D. Moras,et al.  Specific Recognition of Androgens by Their Nuclear Receptor , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  L. Gray,et al.  A novel cell line, MDA-kb2, that stably expresses an androgen- and glucocorticoid-responsive reporter for the detection of hormone receptor agonists and antagonists. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[19]  P B Sigler,et al.  Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor's ligand binding domains. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Peter Scholz,et al.  Structural Evidence for Ligand Specificity in the Binding Domain of the Human Androgen Receptor , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Jean-Pierre Cravedi,et al.  Phenylphenols, biphenols, bisphenol-A and 4-tert-octylphenol exhibit α and β estrogen activities and antiandrogen activity in reporter cell lines , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[22]  F. Labrie,et al.  Androgen receptor antagonists (antiandrogens): structure-activity relationships. , 2000, Current medicinal chemistry.

[23]  L. Gray,et al.  Development of two androgen receptor assays using adenoviral transduction of MMTV-luc reporter and/or hAR for endocrine screening. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  H. Fang,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor , 2003, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[25]  K. Gaido,et al.  Inhibition of androgen receptor-dependent transcriptional activity by DDT isomers and methoxychlor in HepG2 human hepatoma cells. , 1998, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[26]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Impact of induced fit on ligand binding to the androgen receptor: a multidimensional QSAR study to predict endocrine-disrupting effects of environmental chemicals. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Risheng Ma,et al.  UV filters with antagonistic action at androgen receptors in the MDA-kb2 cell transcriptional-activation assay. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[28]  M Carlquist,et al.  Structure of the ligand‐binding domain of oestrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[29]  Svante Wold,et al.  Partial least-squares method for spectrofluorimetric analysis of mixtures of humic acid and lignin sulfonate , 1983 .

[30]  Deborah A. Loughney,et al.  A comparison of progestin and androgen receptor binding using the CoMFA technique , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[31]  Duane D. Miller,et al.  A ligand-based approach to identify quantitative structure-activity relationships for the androgen receptor. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  R J Fletterick,et al.  Hormone-dependent coactivator binding to a hydrophobic cleft on nuclear receptors. , 1998, Science.

[33]  T. Bishop,et al.  Homology modeling using multiple molecular dynamics simulations and docking studies of the human androgen receptor ligand binding domain bound to testosterone and nonsteroidal ligands. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  M. Akamatsu,et al.  Prediction of the Binding Mode of Imidacloprid and Related Compounds to House-Fly Head Acetylcholine Receptors Using Three-Dimensional QSAR Analysis , 1998 .