Comparison of Dental Arch Parameters of Three Degree of Anterior Crowding of Class I Malocclusion

Aim: To assess the relation between the anterior dental crowding in Class I molar occlusion with the dental arch parameters in both dental arches and for both sexes. Materials and Methods: This study presented data from examination of the study casts for a sample of 106 maxillary and 142 mandibular dental arches of pupils of the intermediate school in Mosul City aged 12–15 years of Iraqi origin. The sample was divided into three main groups according to anterior dental crowding degree (0–2.0 mm, 2.1–4 mm and over 4.0 mm). This was done by calculation of dental arch space available (dental arch perimeter) by utilizing the segment arch technique. The six segment technique assessed by using a modified sliding caliper gauge. The mesio–distal crown width of each tooth was measured, to get the space necessary, and the difference between the space available and the space necessary is negative value represent the amount of crowding. The data was analyzed utilizing statistical analyses at p≤0.05 significant level. Results: all the dental arch parameters were insignificantly decreased throughout the three groups accompanied by increase in the degree of anterior dental crowding except the dental arch perimeter which decreased significantly, while intercanine and the canine–molar parameters were insignificantly increased in both dental arches and for both sexes. Conclusion: The inter–canine parameter increase in crowding case whereas the other parameters are decrease.

[1]  T. Taner,et al.  Lower lip sucking habit treated with a lip bumper appliance. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  M. O. Sayin,et al.  Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  S. Peck,et al.  Crown dimensions and mandibular incisor alignment. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  M. Richardson Late lower arch crowding in relation to the direction of eruption. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[5]  S. Bishara,et al.  Changes in tooth size-arch length relationships from the deciduous to the permanent dentition: a longitudinal study. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  M. Richardson Lower arch crowding in the young adult. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  R. Berg Crowding of the dental arches: a longitudinal study of the age period between 6 and 12 years. , 1986, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  R. M. Little,et al.  Mandibular incisor dimensions and crowding. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  W. S. Hunter Application of analysis of crowding and spacing of the teeth. , 1978, Dental clinics of North America.

[10]  C. Lavelle Variation in the secular changes in the teeth and dental arches. , 1973, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  G. Maj Serial extraction in Class I mixed-dentition cases. , 1970, American journal of orthodontics.

[12]  W. Stuart Hunter,et al.  Errors and Discrepancies in Measurement of Tooth Size , 1960, Journal of dental research.

[13]  A. Lundstrom An investigation of 202 pairs of twins regarding fundamental factors in the aetiology of malocclusion. , 1949, The Dental record.

[14]  F. Peter [The classification of malocclusion]. , 1949, Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie.

[15]  O. Dacosta,et al.  Dentofacial anomalies related to the digit sucking habit. , 2002, African journal of medicine and medical sciences.

[16]  D. Woodside,et al.  Relationship between mandibular incisor crowding and nasal mucosal swelling. , 1991, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[17]  J. Elahi,et al.  A comparative study between three ethnic groups to derive some standards for maxillary arch dimensions. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  S. Bishara,et al.  Changes in the maxillary and mandibular tooth size-arch length relationship from early adolescence to early adulthood. A longitudinal study. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  Y. Shiau,et al.  The relationship of dental crowding to tooth size, dental arch width, and arch depth. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences.

[20]  S Abd-el Samad Younes,et al.  Maxillary arch dimensions in Saudi and Egyptian population sample. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  M. Richardson The use of cephalometric x-rays in determining basal bone size and its relationship to crowding. , 1967, Report of the congress. European Orthodontic Society.

[22]  Ashley E. Howes,et al.  Arch width in the premolar region—Still the major problem in orthodontics , 1957 .