Target Control of Cell Disruption To Minimize the Biomass Electrostatic Adhesion during Anion‐Exchange Expanded Bed Adsorption

Expanded bed adsorption (EBA) is an integrative unit operation for the primary recovery of bioproducts from crude feedstock. Biomass electrostatic adhesion often leads to bad bed stability and low adsorption capacity. The results indicate that effective cell disruption is a potential approach to reduce the biomass adhesion during anion‐exchange EBA. Two common cell disruption methods (sonication treatment and high‐pressure disruption with a French press) were investigated in the present work. The mean size of cell debris reduced dramatically during the cell disruption process, and the absolute value of the ζ potential of cell debris also decreased significantly as the mean size reduced. The biomass transmission index (BTI) obtained through the biomass pulse response experiment was used to quantitatively evaluate the biomass‐adsorbent interaction. Combining the influences of ζ potential of adsorbent (ζA), ζ potential of biomass (ζB), and biomass mean size ( dB), the parameter of (–ζA·ζB· dB) was explored as a reasonable indicator of biomass adhesion in expanded beds. A good linear correlation was confirmed between BTI and (–ζA·ζB· dB) for all biomass and cell disruption conditions tested, which was independent of the cell disruption methods. A target parameter (–ζA·ζB· dB) of 120 mV2μm was derived for BTI above 0.9, which meant a very slight influence of biomass on the stability of the expanded bed. This criterion could be used as a rational control target for cell disruption processes in EBA applications.

[1]  D. Lin,et al.  Zeta potential as a diagnostic tool to evaluate the biomass electrostatic adhesion during ion‐exchange expanded bed application , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  M. Kula,et al.  The influence of homogenisation conditions on biomass‐adsorbent interactions during ion‐exchange expanded bed adsorption , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Y. Shanjing Influence of cell homogenization on interactions between biomass and adsorbent in expanded bed ion-exchange adsorption , 2006 .

[4]  A. Ariff,et al.  The influence of bakers’ yeast cells on protein adsorption in anion exchange expanded bed chromatography , 2005 .

[5]  Jörg Thömmes,et al.  Biochemical engineering aspects of expanded bed adsorption. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[6]  Lin Dongqiang QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMASS-ADSORBENT INTERACTIONS IN EXPANDED BED——BIOMASS PULSE RESPONSE METHOD , 2004 .

[7]  M. Kula,et al.  Biomass/adsorbent electrostatic interactions in expanded bed adsorption: a zeta potential study. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  M. Kula,et al.  The Use of Ion‐Selective Electrodes for Evaluating Residence Time Distributions in Expanded Bed Adsorption Systems , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[9]  Dong-Qiang Lin,et al.  Minimising biomass/adsorbent interactions in expanded bed adsorption processes: a methodological design approach , 2001, Bioseparation (Dordrecht).

[10]  M. Kula,et al.  The influence of cell adsorbent interactions on protein adsorption in expanded beds. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  W. Deckwer,et al.  Expanded-bed chromatography in primary protein purification. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  Kula,et al.  The influence of complex biological feedstock on the fluidization and bed stability in expanded bed adsorption , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Bengt Jönsson,et al.  The electrostatic interaction between a charged sphere and an oppositely charged planar surface and its application to protein adsorption , 1999 .

[14]  M. Kula,et al.  Cell/adsorbent interactions in expanded bed adsorption of proteins , 1999, Bioseparation.

[15]  G. H. Fleet,et al.  Composition of the cell walls of several yeast species , 1998, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  J Thömmes,et al.  Fluidized bed adsorption as a primary recovery step in protein purification. , 1997, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[17]  C. Ghommidh,et al.  Influence of medium composition on surface properties and aggregation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain , 1994 .

[18]  H. Chase,et al.  Purification of proteins by adsorption chromatography in expanded beds. , 1994, Trends in biotechnology.

[19]  N. Mozes,et al.  Chemical and physicochemical properties of Escherichia coli: variations among three strains and influence of culture conditions , 1994 .

[20]  D. Mccormick Expanded Bed Adsorption , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[21]  H. Chase,et al.  Liquid fluidized bed adsorption of protein in the presence of cells. , 1991, Bioseparation.

[22]  D. Shaw,et al.  Introduction to colloid and surface chemistry , 1970 .