Computerized Presentation of Text: Effects on Children’s Reading of Informational Material

This study examined whether children’s reading rate, comprehension, and recall are affected by computer presentation of text. Participants were 60 grade five students, who each read two expository texts, one in a traditional print format and the other from a computer monitor, which used a common scrolling text interface. After reading each text, participants were asked to recall as much as they could from what they had read and then answered questions that measured text recall and comprehension. Children took more time to read the passage and recalled more of the text material that they had read from the computer monitor. The benefit of computer presentation disappeared when efficiency variables, which take time into account, were examined. Children were, however, more efficient at comprehending text when reading from paper. The results suggest that children may take more time to read text on computer screens and that they are more efficient when reading text on paper.

[1]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Learning with hypertext learning environments: theory, design, and research , 1995 .

[2]  R. Clark,et al.  North American disputes about research on learning from media , 1990 .

[3]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  A Comparison of Linear and Hypertext Formats in Information Retrieval , 1989, UK Hypertext.

[4]  Don R. Swanson.  Information Retrieval, State of the Art , 1899 .

[5]  Monica S. Castelhano,et al.  Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Paul Muter,et al.  Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? , 1991 .

[7]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: when does nonlinearity help? , 1992, ECHT '92.

[8]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[9]  R. T. Wilkinson,et al.  Proof-reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue , 1987 .

[10]  Michael J. Wenger,et al.  Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text : Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing , 1996 .

[11]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Doing the Same Work with Hard Copy and with Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Computer Terminals , 1984 .

[12]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen , 1990 .

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[14]  Annie Piolat,et al.  Effect of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 1997 .

[15]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature , 1992 .

[16]  Annie Piolat,et al.  Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[18]  Adriana G. Bus,et al.  Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format , 2002 .

[19]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. , 2000 .

[20]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory , 1990 .

[21]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  HyperText: A Psychological Perspective , 1992 .

[22]  J F Juola,et al.  Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Paul Muter,et al.  Designing an Interface to Optimize Reading with Small Display Windows , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[24]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[25]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Attempting to come to grips with alternative perspectives , 1991 .

[26]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading , 1994 .

[27]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[28]  Paul Muter,et al.  Reader-Controlled Computerized Presentation of Text , 1988 .

[29]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading for One Second, One Minute, or One Year From the Perspective of Rauding Theory , 1997 .

[30]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .

[31]  Kerstin Severinson Eklundh.  Problems in Achieving a Global Perspective of the Text in Computer-based Writing , 1992 .

[32]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Proof-reading on VDUs , 1987 .