An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices

Modeling of complex systems and phenomena is of value in science learning and is increasingly emphasised as an important component of science teaching and learning. Modeling engages learners in desired pedagogical activities. These activities include practices such as planning, building, testing, analysing, and critiquing. Designing realistic models is a difficult task. Computer environments allow the creation of dynamic and even more complex models. One way of bringing the design of models within reach is through the use of scaffolds. Scaffolds are intentional assistance provided to learners from a variety of sources, allowing them to complete tasks that would otherwise be out of reach. Currently, our understanding of how scaffolds in software tools assist learners is incomplete. In this paper the scaffolds designed into a dynamic modeling software tool called Model-It are assessed in terms of their ability to support learners' use of modeling practices. Four pairs of middle school students were video-taped as they used the modeling software for three hours, spread over a two week time frame. Detailed analysis of coded videotape transcripts provided evidence of the importance of scaffolds in supporting the use of modeling practices. Learners used a variety of modeling practices, the majority of which occurred in conjunction with scaffolds. The use of three tool scaffolds was assessed as directly as possible, and these scaffolds were seen to support a variety of modeling practices. An argument is made for the continued empirical validation of types and instances of tool scaffolds, and further investigation of the important role of teacher and peer scaffolding in the use of scaffolded tools.

[1]  Barbara C. Buckley.  Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology , 2000 .

[2]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[3]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[4]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery , 1999, Springer US.

[5]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[7]  D. Penner.  Cognition, Computers, and Synthetic Science: Building Knowledge and Meaning Through Modeling , 2000 .

[8]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[9]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? , 1991 .

[10]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[11]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education , 2000 .

[12]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level , 1991 .

[13]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Science Instruction: Historical Trends and Current Opportunities , 1998 .

[14]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Problem Solving in Science Textbooks , 1989 .

[15]  Ann M. Novak,et al.  Incorporating Portable Technology to Enhance an Inquiry, Project-Based Middle School Science Classroom , 2001 .

[16]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[17]  Wolff-Michael Rolf.  Knowledge Diffusion in a Grade 4-5 Classroom during a Unit on Civil Engineering: An Analysis of a Classroom Community in Terms of Its Changing Resources and Practices. , 1996 .

[18]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Secondary Students' Dynamic Modeling Processes: Analyzing, Reasoning About, Synthesizing, and Testing Models of Stream Ecosystems , 1997 .

[19]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[20]  D. Penner.  Building Knowledge and Meaning Through Modeling , 2002 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments , 1996, CHI.

[22]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[23]  P. Shah,et al.  Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction , 2002 .

[24]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Supporting Programming and Learning-to-Program with an Integrated CAD and Scaffolding Workbench , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  K. Squire,et al.  Constructing Virtual Worlds: Tracing the Historical Development of Learner Practices , 2001 .

[26]  Philip Bell,et al.  Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students' Reflection and Argumentation Using a Cognitive Software Guide , 2000 .

[27]  S. Gilbert.  Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[28]  D. Hestenes.  Modeling games in the Newtonian World , 1992 .

[29]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[30]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[31]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century , 1994, INTR.

[32]  Steven J. Stratford.  A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms , 1997 .

[33]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Symphony: a case study for exploring and describing design methods and guidelines for learner-centered design , 2001 .

[34]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses? , 1998 .

[35]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[36]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[37]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model based learning as a key research area for science education , 2000 .

[38]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  The Relationship between Students' Epistemologies and Model-Based Reasoning. , 1997 .

[39]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software , 2000 .

[40]  E. Finkel,et al.  Science as Model Building: Computers and High-School Genetics , 1992 .

[41]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[42]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Research Strategy for the Dynamic Study of Students' Concepts and Problem Solving Strategies Using Science Software. , 1988 .

[43]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Investigating processes and products of secondary science students using dynamic modeling software , 1996 .