Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

In the course of daily living, humans frequently encounter situations in which a motor activity, once initiated, becomes unnecessary or inappropriate. Under such circumstances, the ability to inhibit motor responses can be of vital importance. Although the nature of response inhibition has been studied in psychology for several decades, its neural basis remains unclear. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found that temporary deactivation of the pars opercularis in the right inferior frontal gyrus selectively impairs the ability to stop an initiated action. Critically, deactivation of the same region did not affect the ability to execute responses, nor did it influence physiological arousal. These findings confirm and extend recent reports that the inferior frontal gyrus is vital for mediating response inhibition.

[1]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses and attentional allocation problems on the backward masking task in schizophrenia. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  J. Sergeant The cognitive-energetic model: an empirical approach to Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Modality-Specific Control of Strategic Spatial Attention in Parietal Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  E. Gordon,et al.  Sex differences in adult ADHD: a double dissociation in brain activity and autonomic arousal , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  A Code for Behavioral Inhibition on the Basis of Color, But Not Motion, in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex of Macaque Monkey , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  B. J. Casey,et al.  The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection — a PET study in man , 1996, Brain Research.

[10]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Boris Suchan,et al.  Cortico-subcortical contributions to executive control. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  A. Beech,et al.  Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 1993, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[17]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Beyond common resources: the cortical basis for resolving task interference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Michael E. Goldberg,et al.  Prefrontal Neurons Coding Suppression of Specific Saccades , 2004, Neuron.

[19]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[20]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[21]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Rorden,et al.  Cognitive Control Mechanisms Revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from Repeated Task-Switching , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  R. Kahn,et al.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Joseph A. Sergeant,et al.  Modeling Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Critical Appraisal of the Cognitive-Energetic Model , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[32]  Canan Karatekin,et al.  Development of attentional allocation in the dual task paradigm. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[34]  J. Wall,et al.  Human brain plasticity: an emerging view of the multiple substrates and mechanisms that cause cortical changes and related sensory dysfunctions after injuries of sensory inputs from the body , 2002, Brain Research Reviews.

[35]  Adam R Aron,et al.  Methylphenidate improves response inhibition in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  P. Michie,et al.  Acts of control in schizophrenia: dissociating the components of inhibition , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[37]  B. Meyer,et al.  Influence of transcranial magnetic stimulation on pupil size , 2001, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[38]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[39]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  K. Nakahara,et al.  A rapid presentation event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of response inhibition in macaque monkeys , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.