Origin of the patchy emission pattern at the ZERT CO2 release test

A numerical experiment was carried out to test whether the patchy CO2 emission patterns observed at the Zero Emissions Research and Technology release facility are caused by the presence of packers that divide the horizontal injection well into six CO2-injection zones. A three-dimensional model of the horizontal well and cobble–soil system was developed and simulations using TOUGH2/EOS7CA were carried out. Simulation results show patchy emissions for the seven-packer (six-injection-zone) configuration of the field test. Numerical experiments were then conducted for the cases of 24 packers (23 injection zones) and an effectively infinite number of packers. The time to surface breakthrough and the number of patches increased as the number of packers increased suggesting that packers and associated along-pipe flow are the origin of the patchy emissions. In addition, it was observed that early breakthrough occurs at locations where the horizontal well pipe is shallow and installed mostly in soil rather than the deeper cobble. In the cases where the pipe is installed at shallow depths and directly in the soil, higher pipe gas saturations occur than where the pipe is installed slightly deeper in the cobble. It is believed this is an effect mostly relevant to the model rather than the field system and arises through the influence of capillarity, permeability, and pipe elevation of the soil compared to the cobble adjacent to the pipe.

[1]  Jens Birkholzer,et al.  A shallow subsurface controlled release facility in Bozeman, Montana, USA, for testing near surface CO2 detection techniques and transport models , 2010 .

[2]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Near-surface monitoring strategies for geologic carbon dioxide storage verification , 2003 .

[3]  Lehua Pan.  User information for WinGridder Version 3.0 , 2008 .

[4]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Surface CO2 leakage during two shallow subsurface CO2 releases , 2007 .

[5]  George J. Moridis,et al.  EOS7C Version 1.0: TOUGH2 Module for Carbon Dioxide or Nitrogen inNatural Gas (Methane) Reservoirs , 2004 .

[6]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration , 2008 .

[7]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  The role of optimality in characterizing CO2 seepage from geological carbon sequestration sites , 2007 .

[8]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  On leakage and seepage of CO2 from geologic storage sites into surface water , 2006 .

[9]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2 , 1999 .

[10]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Modeling Gas Transport in the Shallow Subsurface During the ZERT CO2 Release Test , 2010 .

[11]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[12]  K. Pruess.  ECO2N: A TOUGH2 Fluid Property Module for Mixtures of Water, NaCl, and CO2 , 2005 .

[13]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  On Leakage and Seepage from Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites: Unsaturated Zone Attenuation , 2003 .

[14]  J. Lewicki,et al.  Dynamics of CO2 fluxes and concentrations during a shallow subsurface CO2 release , 2010 .

[15]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  On numerical modeling of capillary barriers , 1993 .

[16]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  An improved strategy to detect CO2 leakage for verification of geologic carbon sequestration , 2005 .