Value-driven design for product families: a new approach for estimating value and a novel industry case study

Advanced product platform and product family design methods are needed to define and optimize the value they bring to a company. Maximizing platform commonality and individual product performance often fails to realize the most valuable product family during optimization; however, few examples exist in the literature to explore these trade-offs. This paper introduces a novel industry case study to explore the differences between “traditional” multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) and value-driven design (VDD) approaches to product family design. The case study involves a family of five commercially-available washing machines and integrates multidisciplinary analyses, simulations, mathematical models, and response surface models to obtain ratings for individual product attributes. These attributes are then aggregated into a value function for the product family using a novel approach to estimate sales volume and a demand sensitivity curve derived from publicly available data. We then formulate and solve a “traditional” MDO product family design problem using a multi-objective genetic algorithm to minimize performance deviation and a product family penalty function. A novel VDD formulation is then introduced and solved to maximize the net present value (NPV) for the firm producing the family of products. Visualization and comparison of the results illustrate that the “traditional” MDO formulation can find several promising solutions for the product family, but it fails to find solutions that maximize the value to the firm. The results also provide a benchmark for researchers to explore alternative value function formulations and solution approaches for product family design using the novel industry case study.

[1]  Achille Messac,et al.  Investigating the commonality attributes for scaling product families using comprehensive product platform planning (CP3) , 2013 .

[2]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A market-driven approach to product family design , 2009 .

[3]  Harriet Black Nembhard,et al.  Real options in engineering design, operations, and management , 2009 .

[4]  Achille Messac,et al.  Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP3) Framework , 2011 .

[5]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[6]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Analytical Target Cascading in Automotive Vehicle Design , 2001 .

[7]  Eliot Winer,et al.  Visualization of System Decomposition in a Value-Based Framework , 2014 .

[8]  Robert Van Buskirk,et al.  Estimating sales and sales market share from sales rank data for consumer appliances , 2016 .

[9]  Thomas Nygårds,et al.  Optimization of washing machine kinematics, dynamics, and stability during spinning using a multistep approach , 2014 .

[10]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[11]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  The Design of Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems: Present Challenges and Future Promise , 2012 .

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Paul Collopy,et al.  The Distinct and Interrelated Roles of Value-Driven Design, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, and Decision Analysis , 2012 .

[14]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  ON THE IMPACT OF COUPLING STRENGTH ON COMPLEX SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION FOR SINGLE-LEVEL FORMULATIONS , 2005, DAC 2005.

[15]  Paul Collopy,et al.  ECONOMIC-BASED DISTRIBUTED OPTIMAL DESIGN , 2001 .

[16]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[17]  O. S. Türkay,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Assessment of Suspension Dynamics of a Horizontal-Axis Washing Machine , 1998 .

[18]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Multi-Objective Design Optimization for Product Platform and Product Family Design Using Genetic Algorithms , 2005, DAC 2005.

[19]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Optimal design of magnetorheological fluid-based dampers for front-loaded washing machines , 2014 .

[20]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Enhancing Marketing with Engineering: Optimal Product Line Design for Heterogeneous Markets , 2011 .

[21]  Pinar Boyraz,et al.  Dynamic modeling of a horizontal washing machine and optimization of vibration characteristics using Genetic Algorithms , 2013 .

[22]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[23]  Weui-Bong Jeong,et al.  Dynamic modeling and analysis of drum-type washing machine , 2010 .

[24]  Tae-Uk Jung,et al.  The Simulation Method for the Driving Characteristics of Washing Machine using BLDC Motor , 2012 .

[25]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Determining Product Platform Extent , 2006 .

[26]  Michael P. Martinez,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming , 2002 .

[27]  Hae-Jin Choi,et al.  Reliability estimation of washing machine spider assembly via classification , 2014 .

[28]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[29]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Sensitivity and Correlation Analysis and Implications in Scalable Product Family Design for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2015, DAC 2015.

[30]  Erdinc Altug,et al.  Determining the mass and angular position of the unbalanced load in horizontal washing machines , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[31]  Nguyen Dang Hung Editorial: Asia Pacific Journal on Computational Engineering , 2014 .

[32]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[33]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming , 2000 .

[34]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  From user requirements to commonality specifications: an integrated approach to product family design , 2010 .

[35]  Arun Kumar,et al.  Flexibility valuation of product family architecture: a real-option approach , 2006 .

[36]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[37]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[38]  M. H. Eres,et al.  Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design , 2016 .

[39]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Profit and Operational-Based Value Functions , 2014 .

[40]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  A Decomposed Gradient-Based Approach for Generalized Platform Selection and Variant Design in Product Family , 2008 .

[41]  Thomas Nygårds,et al.  Multibody modeling and vibration dynamics analysis of washing machines , 2012 .

[42]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Designing scalable product families by the radial basis function–high-dimensional model representation metamodelling technique , 2015 .

[43]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  An efficient decomposed multiobjective genetic algorithm for solving the joint product platform selection and product family design problem with generalized commonality , 2009 .

[44]  C. Bloebaum,et al.  Incorporating Value-Driven Design into the Visualization of Design Spaces Using Contextual Self-Organizing Maps: A Case Study of Satellite Design , 2014 .

[45]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Value-Driven Design , 2011 .

[46]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[47]  Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.  A Decomposition Method for Exploiting Parallel Computing Including the Determination of an Optimal Number of Subsystems , 2013 .

[48]  Menderes Kalkat Experimentally vibration and noise analysis of two types of washing machines with a proposed neural network predictor , 2014 .

[49]  Seung Ki Moon,et al.  Platform design variable identification for a product family using multi-objective particle swarm optimization , 2014 .

[50]  Christopher Hoyle,et al.  Fundamentals of Analytical Techniques for Modeling Consumer Preferences and Choices , 2013 .

[51]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Value‐Driven Design – A methodology to Link Expectations to Technical Requirements in the Extended Enterprise , 2013 .

[52]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Real options analysis : tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions , 2012 .

[53]  John W. Dahlgren 9.3.2 “Real Options and Value Driven Design in Spiral Development” , 2006 .

[54]  T. Simpson Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families , 2006 .

[55]  W. Soedel,et al.  ON THE PROBLEM OF OSCILLATORY WALK OF AUTOMATIC WASHING MACHINES , 1995 .

[56]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling and Decomposition of Multidisciplinary Design Problems , 1996 .

[57]  Jung-Hyo Lee,et al.  Load modeling for the drum washing machine system simulation , 2007, 2007 7th Internatonal Conference on Power Electronics.

[58]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[59]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Optimal design and performance evaluation of a flow-mode MR damper for front-loaded washing machines , 2014 .

[60]  Steve Wiseall,et al.  Value driven design: an initial study applied to novel aerospace components in Rolls-Royce plc , 2008 .

[61]  Sergio M. Savaresi,et al.  Control of magnetorheological dampers for vibration reduction in a washing machine , 2009 .

[62]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Many objective visual analytics: rethinking the design of complex engineered systems , 2013 .

[63]  James Scanlan,et al.  Application of Value-Driven Design to Commercial Aero-Engine Systems , 2010 .