Are the subjective complaints of traumatically brain injured patients reliable?

The present study was designed to compare the subjective complaints of 50 traumatically brain injured (TBI) patients with the observations of their significant others. The complaints of the TBI patients and their significant others were contrasted according to the severity of the TBI and the type of complaint (physical, cognitive/behavioural and emotional). While no differences were found in physical complaints, the cognitive/behavioural and emotional complaints of TBI patients, regardless of the severity of the initial TBI, were significantly under-reported in comparison to the observations of their significant others. The data suggests that while this finding was most likely due to the TBI patients' poor awareness, it was unlikely to be the result of psychological denial since all of these individuals were evaluated in the context of being a plaintiff in personal injury litigation or a claimant in a Workers' Compensation claim. The data suggests that the cerebral trauma these patients sustained played a major role in their ability to recognize their cognitive, behavioural and emotional symptoms. Finally, the data suggests that clinicians should obtain information about the TBI patients' cognitive/behavioural and emotional functioning from their significant others, rather than rely entirely on the TBI patients' subjective assessment of these problems.

[1]  B. Giordani,et al.  Disability caused by minor head injury. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[2]  L. M. Brown,et al.  Base rates of post-concussional symptoms. , 1988, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[3]  R. Ruff,et al.  Self-rating versus neuropsychological performance of moderate versus severe head-injured patients. , 1990, Brain injury.

[4]  Postconcussion symptoms and daily stress in normal and head-injured college populations. , 1992, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[5]  L. Binder,et al.  A review of mild head trauma. Part II: Clinical implications. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  N. Bohnen,et al.  Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent symptoms six months after mild head injury. , 1992, Neurosurgery.

[7]  R. Kelly.  The post-traumatic syndrome: an iatrogenic disease. , 1975, Forensic science.

[8]  L. Binder.  Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome. , 1986, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[9]  W. Alves,et al.  Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury , 1993 .

[10]  D. Gronwall,et al.  Time off work and symptoms after minor head injury. , 1981, Injury.

[11]  T. Novack,et al.  Postconcussion symptoms after head trauma: interpretation and treatment. , 1986, Southern medical journal.

[12]  A. Purisch,et al.  Hazards of blind analysis of neuropsychological test data in assessing cognitive disability: the role of confounding factors. , 1996, NeuroRehabilitation.

[13]  J. Youngjohn,et al.  Brain damage or compensation neurosis? The controversial post-concussion syndrome , 1995 .

[14]  A. Wyler,et al.  The behavioral sequelae of head injury. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[15]  V. E. Weighill.  'Compensation neurosis': a review of the literature. , 1983, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[16]  G. Prigatano,et al.  Behavioral Limitations TBI patients tend to underestimate: A replication and extension to patients with lateralized cerebral dysfunction , 1996 .